Sari la conținut

CtEDO

🔔 Autentifică-te pentru a primi hotărâri noi pe email
Toți anii 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000
Articole CEDO
Articolul 2 Articolul 3 Articolul 5 Articolul 6 Articolul 7 Articolul 8 Articolul 9 Articolul 10 Articolul 11 Articolul 13 Articolul 14 Articolul 18 Articolul 34 Articolul 35 Articolul 37 Articolul 38 Articolul 41 Articolul 46 Articolul 1 din Protocolul 1 Articolul 3 din Protocolul 1 Articolul 2 din Protocolul 4 Articolul 2 din Protocolul 7 Articolul 4 din Protocolul 7
CtEDO 04.06.2020
CASE OF ALEKSEYEV v. UKRAINE
CtEDO 04.06.2020
CASE OF GONCHARUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
CtEDO 04.06.2020
CASE OF IVANOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
CtEDO 04.06.2020
CASE OF MICHALAKIS v. GREECE
CtEDO 04.06.2020
CASE OF CHOBANOV AND KOYRUSHKI v. BULGARIA
CtEDO 03.06.2020
MAGNÚS GUÐMUNDSSON v. ICELAND
CtEDO 03.06.2020
LAVANCHY c. SUISSE
CtEDO 03.06.2020
ELVAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
CtEDO 03.06.2020
VALAITIS v. LITHUANIA
CtEDO 03.06.2020
UAB ,,KESKO SENUKAI LITHUANIA" v. LITHUANIA
CtEDO 03.06.2020
Forthcoming hearings in June 2020
CtEDO 03.06.2020
Annonce d’audiences en juin 2020
CtEDO 02.06.2020
CASE OF N.T. v. RUSSIA
CtEDO 02.06.2020
ÇÖÇELLI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
CtEDO 02.06.2020
KESIDIS ET AUTRES c. GRÈCE
CtEDO 02.06.2020
RAYNOVI v. BULGARIA
CtEDO 02.06.2020
BUCHA v. SLOVAKIA
CtEDO 02.06.2020
ANTIPOV v. RUSSIA
CtEDO 02.06.2020
VINOGRADOV v. RUSSIA
CtEDO 02.06.2020
CASE OF GOSPODĂRIA ȚĂRĂNEASCĂ CHIPER TERENTI GRIGORE v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
CtEDO 02.06.2020
AFFAIRE SOLODNIKOV c. RUSSIE
CtEDO 02.06.2020
CASE OF SOLODNIKOV v. RUSSIA
CtEDO 02.06.2020
AFFAIRE FIRSTOV c. RUSSIE
CtEDO 02.06.2020
Communication of Sobczynska and Others v. Poland - procedures for appointing and promoting judges
CtEDO 02.06.2020
Communication Sobczynksa et autres c. Pologne - procédures de nomination et d'avancement de juges
CtEDO 02.06.2020
Arrêts du 02.06.20
CtEDO 02.06.2020
Judgments of 02.06.2020
CtEDO 02.06.2020
Judgment N.T. v. Russia - systemic problem concerning strict imprisonment regime for life prisoners
CtEDO 02.06.2020
Judgment A and B v. Romania - complaints about a witness protection programme: no violation
CtEDO 02.06.2020
AFFAIRE A ET B c. ROUMANIE
CtEDO 02.06.2020
CASE OF A AND B v. ROMANIA
CtEDO 02.06.2020
CASE OF A AND B v. ROMANIA
CtEDO 29.05.2020
VAGDALT v. HUNGARY
CtEDO 29.05.2020
JURKOVIĆ v. CROATIA
CtEDO 29.05.2020
Annonce d’arrêts et décisions 02-04.06.2020
CtEDO 29.05.2020
Forthcoming judgments and decisions 02-04.06.2020
CtEDO 29.05.2020
La Cour rend un avis consultatif à la Cour constitutionnelle arménienne
CtEDO 29.05.2020
The Court issues an advisory opinion to the Constitutional Court of Armenia
CtEDO 29.05.2020
Dictamen en relación con el uso de la técnica de “tipificación en blanco” o “tipificación por remisión” en la definición de un delito y los patrones comparativos entre el derecho penal vigente en el momento de la comisión del delito y el derecho penal modificado [Traduction al español] por el Ministerio de Justicia
CtEDO 29.05.2020
Advisory opinion concerning the use of the "blanket reference" or "legislation by reference" technique in the definition of an offence and the standards of comparison between the criminal law in force at the time of the commission of the offence and the amended criminal law
CtEDO 29.05.2020
Advisory opinion concerning the use of the “blanket reference” or “legislation by reference” technique in the definition of an offence and the standards of comparison between the criminal law in force at the time of the commission of the offence and the amended criminal law
CtEDO 29.05.2020
Avis consultatif relatif à l’utilisation de la technique de « législation par référence » pour la définition d’une infraction et aux critères à appliquer pour comparer la loi pénale telle qu’elle était en vigueur au moment de la commission de l’infraction et la loi pénale telle que modifiée
CtEDO 29.05.2020
Advisory opinion concerning the use of the "blanket reference" or "legislation by reference" technique in the definition of an offence and the standards of comparison between the criminal law in force at the time of the commission of the offence and the amended criminal law
CtEDO 29.05.2020
Advisory opinion concerning the use of the "blanket reference" or "legislation by reference" technique in the definition of an offence and the standards of comparison between the criminal law in force at the time of the commission of the offence and the amended criminal law
CtEDO 29.05.2020
Legal summary - Advisory opinion concerning the use of the "blanket reference" or "legislation by reference" technique in the definition of an offence and the standards of comparison between the criminal law in force at the time of the commission of the offence and the amended criminal law
CtEDO 29.05.2020
Résumé juridique - Avis consultatif relatif à l’utilisation de la technique de « législation par référence » pour la définition d’une infraction et aux critères à appliquer pour comparer la loi pénale telle qu’elle était en vigueur au moment de la commission de l’infraction et la loi pénale telle que modifiée
CtEDO 28.05.2020
CASE OF EVERS v. GERMANY
CtEDO 28.05.2020
CASE OF EVERS v. GERMANY
CtEDO 28.05.2020
CASE OF EVERS v. GERMANY
CtEDO 28.05.2020
Décision Dirjan et Stefan c. Roumanie - recours compensatoire suffisant et approprié pour réparer les mauvaises conditions de détention
CtEDO 28.05.2020
Arrêts et décisions du 28.05.20
CtEDO 28.05.2020
Judgments and decisions of 28.05.2020
CtEDO 28.05.2020
Judgment Farzaliyev v. Azerbaijan - proceedings against former Prime Minister of autonomous region in Azerbaijan accused of embezzlement
CtEDO 28.05.2020
Décision Graner c. France - consultation de certaines archives de la présidence de la République relatives au Rwanda : irrecevable
CtEDO 28.05.2020
Decision Graner v. France - consultation of certain archives of the French President’s office on Rwanda: inadmissible
CtEDO 28.05.2020
CASE OF MACEDONIAN CLUB FOR ETHNIC TOLERANCE IN BULGARIA AND RADONOV v. BULGARIA
CtEDO 28.05.2020
CASE OF VYSHNEVSKYY AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
CtEDO 28.05.2020
CASE OF RASPRYAKHIN v. UKRAINE
CtEDO 28.05.2020
AFFAIRE VASILOPOULOS c. GRÈCE
CtEDO 28.05.2020
AFFAIRE DI.M. c. GRÈCE
CtEDO 28.05.2020
CASE OF RASIŃSKI v. POLAND
CtEDO 28.05.2020
CASE OF AVTO ATOM DOO KOCHANI v. NORTH MACEDONIA
CtEDO 28.05.2020
CASE OF VASILEV AND SOCIETY OF THE REPRESSED MACEDONIANS IN BULGARIA VICTIMS OF THE COMMUNIST TERROR v. BULGARIA
CtEDO 28.05.2020
SOKOLOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CtEDO 28.05.2020
MOROZOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CtEDO 28.05.2020
MOCHALOV c. RUSSIE
CtEDO 28.05.2020
MELNIKOV v. RUSSIA
CtEDO 28.05.2020
MAZUR AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CtEDO 28.05.2020
IKAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CtEDO 28.05.2020
KHRUSHCHEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CtEDO 28.05.2020
SÖYLEMEZ v. TURKEY
CtEDO 28.05.2020
YÜCEL v. TURKEY
CtEDO 28.05.2020
OKYALTIRIK c. TURQUIE
CtEDO 28.05.2020
KELMUKHAMBETOV v. RUSSIA
CtEDO 28.05.2020
GRACHEV v. RUSSIA
CtEDO 28.05.2020
YALÇIN AND AYKUT v. TURKEY
CtEDO 28.05.2020
SALUR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
CtEDO 28.05.2020
ÇERIKAN v. TURKEY
CtEDO 28.05.2020
ȘEKER c. TURQUIE
CtEDO 28.05.2020
OTYILDIZ v. TURKEY
CtEDO 28.05.2020
ROTARU v. ROMANIA
CtEDO 28.05.2020
BORODI v. ROMANIA
CtEDO 28.05.2020
Z.N. v. THE NETHERLANDS
CtEDO 28.05.2020
BONDARENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CtEDO 28.05.2020
KONDYREV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CtEDO 28.05.2020
NEKRASOV v. UKRAINE
CtEDO 28.05.2020
TOLSTENKO v. UKRAINE
CtEDO 28.05.2020
BAZHERYAN v. UKRAINE
CtEDO 28.05.2020
TARASOV v. UKRAINE
CtEDO 28.05.2020
SOZHOD v. UKRAINE
CtEDO 28.05.2020
DYRNAYEVA v. UKRAINE
CtEDO 28.05.2020
VOLKOVA v. UKRAINE
CtEDO 28.05.2020
KÜSMŐDI AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
CtEDO 28.05.2020
ILLÉS v. HUNGARY
CtEDO 28.05.2020
KEVEI v. HUNGARY
CtEDO 28.05.2020
PAPP AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
CtEDO 28.05.2020
FARKAS AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
CtEDO 28.05.2020
CASE OF ROMANOV v. UKRAINE
CtEDO 28.05.2020
Decision Dirjan and Stefan v. Romania - compensatory remedy provided adequate and appropriate redress for unsatisfactory prison conditions
CtEDO 28.05.2020
CASE OF Z v. BULGARIA