CtEDO · 2020
Toți anii
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
CtEDO
02.06.2020
CASE OF SOLODNIKOV v. RUSSIA
CtEDO
02.06.2020
CASE OF A AND B v. ROMANIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania
CtEDO
02.06.2020
CASE OF GOSPODĂRIA ȚĂRĂNEASCĂ CHIPER TERENTI GRIGORE v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
CtEDO
02.06.2020
AFFAIRE A ET B c. ROUMANIE
CtEDO
02.06.2020
AFFAIRE FIRSTOV c. RUSSIE
CtEDO
02.06.2020
VINOGRADOV v. RUSSIA
CtEDO
02.06.2020
CASE OF N.T. v. RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by Teodor Papuc
CtEDO
02.06.2020
Communication Sobczynksa et autres c. Pologne - procédures de nomination et d'avancement de juges
CtEDO
02.06.2020
Judgment A and B v. Romania - complaints about a witness protection programme: no violation
CtEDO
02.06.2020
Communication of Sobczynska and Others v. Poland - procedures for appointing and promoting judges
CtEDO
02.06.2020
Judgment N.T. v. Russia - systemic problem concerning strict imprisonment regime for life prisoners
CtEDO
02.06.2020
Judgments of 02.06.2020
CtEDO
02.06.2020
Arrêts du 02.06.20
CtEDO
02.06.2020
CASE OF A AND B v. ROMANIA - [Croatian Translation] summary by the Office of the representative of the Republic of Croatia
CtEDO
02.06.2020
RAYNOVI v. BULGARIA
CtEDO
02.06.2020
ANTIPOV v. RUSSIA
CtEDO
02.06.2020
BUCHA v. SLOVAKIA
CtEDO
02.06.2020
KESIDIS ET AUTRES c. GRÈCE
CtEDO
29.05.2020
VAGDALT v. HUNGARY
CtEDO
29.05.2020
The Court issues an advisory opinion to the Constitutional Court of Armenia
CtEDO
29.05.2020
La Cour rend un avis consultatif à la Cour constitutionnelle arménienne
CtEDO
29.05.2020
Forthcoming judgments and decisions 02-04.06.2020
CtEDO
29.05.2020
Annonce d’arrêts et décisions 02-04.06.2020
CtEDO
29.05.2020
JURKOVIĆ v. CROATIA
CtEDO
29.05.2020
Advisory opinion concerning the use of the "blanket reference" or "legislation by reference" technique in the definition of an offence and the standards of comparison between the criminal law in force at the time of the commission of the offence and the amended criminal law - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)
CtEDO
29.05.2020
Résumé juridique - Avis consultatif relatif à l’utilisation de la technique de « législation par référence » pour la définition d’une infraction et aux critères à appliquer pour comparer la loi pénale telle qu’elle était en vigueur au moment de la commission de l’infraction et la loi pénale telle que modifiée
CtEDO
29.05.2020
Legal summary - Advisory opinion concerning the use of the "blanket reference" or "legislation by reference" technique in the definition of an offence and the standards of comparison between the criminal law in force at the time of the commission of the offence and the amended criminal law
CtEDO
29.05.2020
Advisory opinion concerning the use of the "blanket reference" or "legislation by reference" technique in the definition of an offence and the standards of comparison between the criminal law in force at the time of the commission of the offence and the amended criminal law - [Czech Translation] summary by the Ministry of Justice of the Czech Republic
CtEDO
29.05.2020
Advisory opinion concerning the use of the "blanket reference" or "legislation by reference" technique in the definition of an offence and the standards of comparison between the criminal law in force at the time of the commission of the offence and the amended criminal law
CtEDO
29.05.2020
Avis consultatif relatif à l’utilisation de la technique de « législation par référence » pour la définition d’une infraction et aux critères à appliquer pour comparer la loi pénale telle qu’elle était en vigueur au moment de la commission de l’infraction et la loi pénale telle que modifiée
CtEDO
29.05.2020
Advisory opinion concerning the use of the “blanket reference” or “legislation by reference” technique in the definition of an offence and the standards of comparison between the criminal law in force at the time of the commission of the offence and the amended criminal law - [Croatian Translation] by the Office of the representative of the Republic of Croatia
CtEDO
29.05.2020
Dictamen en relación con el uso de la técnica de “tipificación en blanco” o “tipificación por remisión” en la definición de un delito y los patrones comparativos entre el derecho penal vigente en el momento de la comisión del delito y el derecho penal modificado [Traduction al español] por el Ministerio de Justicia
CtEDO
28.05.2020
CASE OF VASILEV AND SOCIETY OF THE REPRESSED MACEDONIANS IN BULGARIA VICTIMS OF THE COMMUNIST TERROR v. BULGARIA
CtEDO
28.05.2020
MOCHALOV c. RUSSIE
CtEDO
28.05.2020
KELMUKHAMBETOV v. RUSSIA
CtEDO
28.05.2020
GRACHEV v. RUSSIA
CtEDO
28.05.2020
KHRUSHCHEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CtEDO
28.05.2020
SALUR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
CtEDO
28.05.2020
YÜCEL v. TURKEY
CtEDO
28.05.2020
AFFAIRE EVERS c. ALLEMAGNE
CtEDO
28.05.2020
Evers c. Allemagne
CtEDO
28.05.2020
AFFAIRE FARZALIYEV c. AZERBAÏDJAN
CtEDO
28.05.2020
Decision Dirjan and Stefan v. Romania - compensatory remedy provided adequate and appropriate redress for unsatisfactory prison conditions
CtEDO
28.05.2020
CASE OF EVERS v. GERMANY - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)
CtEDO
28.05.2020
CASE OF EVERS v. GERMANY
CtEDO
28.05.2020
Evers v. Germany
CtEDO
28.05.2020
CASE OF EVERS v. GERMANY - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by Teodor Papuc
CtEDO
28.05.2020
CASE OF FARZALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN - [Croatian Translation] summary by the Office of the representative of the Republic of Croatia
CtEDO
28.05.2020
CASE OF EVERS v. GERMANY - [German Translation] by the German Federal Government
CtEDO
28.05.2020
Farzaliyev c. Azerbaïdjan