ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 29.05.2020 RO

Advisory opinion concerning the use of the “blanket reference” or “legislation by reference” technique in the definition of an offence and the standards of comparison between the criminal law in force at the time of the commission of the offence and the amended criminal law - [Croatian Translation] by the Office of the representative of the Republic of Croatia

RESPONDENT
ARM
HOTĂRÂRE
29.05.2020
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2020
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
Advisory opinion concerning the use of the “blanket reference” or “legislation by reference” technique in the definition of an offence and the standards of comparison between the criminal law in force at the time of the commission of the offence and the amended criminal law - [Croatian Translation] by the Office of the representative of the Republic of Croatia (CtEDO, 2020)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2022-05-24
0,89
CASE OF SİNAN ÇETİNKAYA AND AĞYAR ÇETİNKAYA v. TURKEY
where there are differences between the criminal law in force at the time of the commission of the offence and subsequent criminal laws enacted before a final judgment is rendered, the courts must apply the law whose provisions are most fav
CtEDO 2024-06-18
0,88
CASE OF A.P. v. ARMENIA - [Czech Translation] summary by the Ministry of Justice of the Czech Republic
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment;Positive obligations) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for p
CtEDO 2020-10-08
0,88
CASE OF JHANGIRYAN v. ARMENIA – [Armenian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of Armenia
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 5 -
CtEDO 2023-06-14
0,88
MIKELADZE v. ARMENIA
], no. 41720/13, § 135, 25 June 2019; Smiljanić v. Croatia, no. 35983/14, §§ 65 and 66, 25 March 2021)? b. Having regard to the procedural obligation to set up an effective and independent judicial system capable of promptly establishing th
CtEDO 2021-12-08
0,88
CASE OF ŠKRLJ AGAINST CROATIA
made by the Court in this case (see document DH-DD(2021)1195 ); Considering that the question of individual measures was resolved, given that the impugned proceedings were reopened and in the fresh proceedings the applicant's case was assig
Sursă