CtEDO 29.05.2020 RO

Advisory opinion concerning the use of the "blanket reference" or "legislation by reference" technique in the definition of an offence and the standards of comparison between the criminal law in force at the time of the commission of the offence and the amended criminal law - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)

RESPONDENT
ARM
HOTĂRÂRE
29.05.2020
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2020
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
Advisory opinion concerning the use of the "blanket reference" or "legislation by reference" technique in the definition of an offence and the standards of comparison between the criminal law in force at the time of the commission of the offence and the amended criminal law - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM) (CtEDO, 2020)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2022-05-24
0,89
CASE OF SİNAN ÇETİNKAYA AND AĞYAR ÇETİNKAYA v. TURKEY
where there are differences between the criminal law in force at the time of the commission of the offence and subsequent criminal laws enacted before a final judgment is rendered, the courts must apply the law whose provisions are most fav
CtEDO 2023-05-23
0,88
CASE OF A.E. v. BULGARIA - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Positive obligations) (Substa
CtEDO 2024-06-18
0,88
CASE OF A.P. v. ARMENIA - [Czech Translation] summary by the Ministry of Justice of the Czech Republic
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment;Positive obligations) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for p
CtEDO 2020-10-08
0,88
CASE OF JHANGIRYAN v. ARMENIA
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 5 -
CtEDO 2020-10-08
0,88
CASE OF JHANGIRYAN v. ARMENIA – [Armenian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of Armenia
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 5 -
Sursă