ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 29.05.2020 RO

Advisory opinion concerning the use of the "blanket reference" or "legislation by reference" technique in the definition of an offence and the standards of comparison between the criminal law in force at the time of the commission of the offence and the amended criminal law

RESPONDENT
ARM
HOTĂRÂRE
29.05.2020
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2020
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
Advisory opinion concerning the use of the "blanket reference" or "legislation by reference" technique in the definition of an offence and the standards of comparison between the criminal law in force at the time of the commission of the offence and the amended criminal law (CtEDO, 2020)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2022-05-24
0,88
CASE OF SİNAN ÇETİNKAYA AND AĞYAR ÇETİNKAYA v. TURKEY
where there are differences between the criminal law in force at the time of the commission of the offence and subsequent criminal laws enacted before a final judgment is rendered, the courts must apply the law whose provisions are most fav
CtEDO 2020-10-08
0,87
Jhangiryan v. Armenia
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 5 -
CtEDO 2020-10-08
0,87
CASE OF JHANGIRYAN v. ARMENIA
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 5 -
CtEDO 2025-08-19
0,87
AVETYAN v. ARMENIA
so, have these mechanisms been effectively applied in the present case? The Government are requested to provide information on the investigative measures taken within the criminal proceedings initiated under Article 241 § 1 of the Criminal
CtEDO 2022-10-06
0,87
GRIGORYAN v. ARMENIA
complaint under Article 10 of the Convention, as required by Article 35 § 1 of the Convention? In particular, the Government are requested to explain whether there were any effective remedies in the domestic legal system in respect of the a
Sursă