CtEDO 08.01.2013 Auto

CASE OF BUCUR AND TOMA v. ROMANIA

RESPONDENT
ROU
HOTĂRÂRE
08.01.2013
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 38 - Examination of the case-{general} (Article 38 - Obligation to furnish all necessary facilities);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 13+8 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life;Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - award
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2013
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF BUCUR AND TOMA v. ROMANIA (CtEDO, 2013)
HUDOC · oficial

Rezistarea inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;Încălcarea articoluluiui 38 - Examinarea cazului-{general} (art. 38 - Obligația de a furniza toate facilitățile necesare);Încălcarea articoluluiui 10 - Libertatea de expresie-{general} (art. 10-1 - Libertate de expresie);Încălcarea articoluluiui 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (art. 6 - Procedura penală;art. 6-1 - Audiere echitabilă);Încălcarea articoluluiui 8 - Dreptul de respectare a vieții private și de familie (art. 8-1 - Respectarea vieții private);Încălcarea articoluluiui 13+8 - Dreptul la un remediu eficace (art. 13 - Remediare eficace) (art. 8-1 - Respectarea vieții private;art. 8 - Dreptul de respectare a vieții private și a vieții familiale);Distrucțiuni pecuniarecuniarecuniarecuniale respintale respintate;

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2013-01-08
0,99
CASE OF BUCUR AND TOMA v. ROMANIA - [Romanian Translation] by the SCM Romania and IER
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 38 - Examination of the case-{general} (Article 38 - Obligation to furnish all necessary facilities);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Art
CtEDO 2013-01-08
0,98
Bucur and Toma v. Romania
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 38 - Examination of the case and friendly settlement proceedings;Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Violation of Article 6 - Right to
CtEDO 2017-02-28
0,95
CASE OF BIVOLARU v. ROMANIA - [Romanian translation] by the SCM Romania and IER
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c - Reasonable suspicion);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and
CtEDO 2016-01-12
0,95
CASE OF BOACĂ AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigat
CtEDO 2021-06-01
0,95
CASE OF ASSOCIATION ACCEPT AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discriminatio
Sursă