CtEDO 08.01.2013 Auto

Bucur and Toma v. Romania

RESPONDENT
ROU
HOTĂRÂRE
08.01.2013
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 38 - Examination of the case and friendly settlement proceedings;Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 13+8 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - award
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2013
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză
Bucur and Toma v. Romania (CtEDO, 2013)
HUDOC · oficial

Rezistare inadmisibilă;Încălcarea articoluluiui 38 - Examinarea procedurilor de soluționare a cazului și a procedurilor de soluționare prietenoase;Încălcarea articoluluiui 10 - Libertatea de exprimare -{general} (art. 10-1 - Libertatea de exprimare);Încălcarea articoluluiui 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (art. 6 - Procedura penală;art. 6-1 - Audiere echitabilă);Încălcarea articoluluiui 8 - Dreptul de respectare a vieții private și a vieții familiale (art. 8-1 - Respectarea vieții private);Violare a articolului 13+8 - Dreptul la un remediu eficace (art. 13 - Remediare eficace) (art. 8 - Dreptul de respectare a vieții private și a vieții familiale;art. 8-1 - Respectul vieții private);Dauturi pecuniare - cerere respinsă;Auzie moralecuniarecuniare

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2013-01-08
0,98
CASE OF BUCUR AND TOMA v. ROMANIA
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 38 - Examination of the case-{general} (Article 38 - Obligation to furnish all necessary facilities);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Art
CtEDO 2013-01-08
0,97
CASE OF BUCUR AND TOMA v. ROMANIA - [Romanian Translation] by the SCM Romania and IER
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 38 - Examination of the case-{general} (Article 38 - Obligation to furnish all necessary facilities);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Art
CtEDO 2013-01-08
0,95
Bucur et Toma c. Roumanie
Partiellement irrecevable;Violation de l'article 38 - Examen contradictoire de l'affaire et procédure de règlement amiable;Violation de l'article 10 - Liberté d'expression-{Générale} (Article 10-1 - Liberté d'expression);Violation de l'arti
CtEDO 2012-04-10
0,94
CASE OF POPA AND TANASESCU v. ROMANIA
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6-3-c - Defence in person) (Article 6-3-c - Defence in person;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial
CtEDO 2016-04-26
0,94
CASE OF AMARANDEI AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA - [Romanian translation] by the SCM Romania and IER
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violatio
Sursă