CtEDO 04.04.2017 AI

CASE OF MATANOVIĆ v. CROATIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova

RESPONDENT
HRV
HOTĂRÂRE
04.04.2017
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Manifestly ill-founded);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Freedom from attachment;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2017
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF MATANOVIĆ v. CROATIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova (CtEDO, 2017)
HUDOC · oficial

Restul inadmisibil (Articolul 35-3-a - Manifestă lipsă de temei);Încălcarea Articolului 8 - Dreptul la respectarea vieții private și familiale (Articolul 8-1 - Respectarea corespondenței;Respectarea vieții private);Nicio încălcare a Articolului 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (Articolul 6 - Proceduri penale;Articolul 6-1 - Judecată echitabilă);Încălcarea Articolului 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (Articolul 6 - Proceduri penale;Articolul 6-1 - Judecată echitabilă);Prejudiciul patrimonial - cererea respinsă (Articolul 41 - Protecția împotriva confiscării;Satisfacție echitabilă);Prejudiciul moral - acordare (Articolul 41 - Prejudiciul moral;Satisfacție echitabilă)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2017-04-04
0,98
CASE OF MATANOVIĆ v. CROATIA
Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Manifestly ill-founded);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life);No violation of Article 6 - Right to
CtEDO 2017-04-04
0,97
Matanović v. Croatia
Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Manifestly ill-founded);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life);No violation of Article 6 - Right to
CtEDO 2015-09-03
0,95
CASE OF M. AND M. v. CROATIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the European Institute of Romania
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Positive oblig
CtEDO 2015-09-03
0,95
CASE OF M. AND M. v. CROATIA - [Romanian translation] legal summary by the SCM Romania and IER
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Positive obligations);No violation of Article 8
CtEDO 2019-05-07
0,94
CASE OF MITYANIN AND LEONOV v. RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article
Sursă