CtEDO 07.05.2019 AI

CASE OF MITYANIN AND LEONOV v. RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova

RESPONDENT
RUS
HOTĂRÂRE
07.05.2019
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Review by a court);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-5 - Compensation);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2019
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF MITYANIN AND LEONOV v. RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova (CtEDO, 2019)
HUDOC · oficial

Recursiune inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate; (Art. 35-1) Perioada de șase luni; (Art. 35-3-a) Manifestă lipsă de fundament; Încălcarea Articolului 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (Articolul 5-1 - Arestare sau detenție conformă legii); Încălcarea Articolului 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (Articolul 5-3 - Temeinicia detentiei preventive); Încălcarea Articolului 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (Articolul 5-4 - Examinare de către o instanță); Încălcarea Articolului 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (Articolul 5-5 - Despăgubire); Încălcarea Articolului 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (Articolul 6 - Proceduri penale; Articolul 6-1 - Judecată echitabilă); Nicio încălcare a Articolului 8 - Dreptul la respectarea vieții private și familiale (Articolul 8-1 - Respectarea vieții private); Daune morale - acordate (Articolul 41 - Daune morale; Satisfacție echitabilă); Daune materiale - cerere respinsă (Articolul 41 - Daune materiale; Satisfacție echitabilă)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2018-07-17
0,96
CASE OF MARIYA ALEKHINA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspec
CtEDO 2018-11-27
0,95
CASE OF ALEKSEYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Violation of Article 13+11 - Right to an effect
CtEDO 2019-07-16
0,95
CASE OF ZHDANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Locus standi;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibi
CtEDO 2017-02-07
0,95
CASE OF LASHMANKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 13+11 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association;Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Violation of Article 11+10 - Fre
CtEDO 2019-08-27
0,95
CASE OF MAGNITSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Equality of arms);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Ar
Sursă