CtEDO 16.10.2018 AI

CASE OF ZHIDOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova

RESPONDENT
RUS
HOTĂRÂRE
16.10.2018
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions;Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Control of the use of property);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions;Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Control of the use of property);Just satisfaction reserved (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2018
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF ZHIDOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova (CtEDO, 2018)
HUDOC · oficial

Restul inadmisibil (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate; (Art. 35-3-a) Manifestă lipsa de temei; Nicio violare a Articolului 1 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Protecția proprietății (Articolul 1 para. 1 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Pacea privind posesia; Articolul 1 para. 2 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Controlul folosinței proprietății); Violare a Articolului 1 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Protecția proprietății (Articolul 1 para. 1 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Pacea privind posesia; Articolul 1 para. 2 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Controlul folosinței proprietății); Satisfacție echitabilă rezervată (Articolul 41 - Prejudiciu nematerial; Prejudiciu material; Satisfacție echitabilă)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2017-11-07
0,95
CASE OF ZUBKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova
Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Struck o
CtEDO 2019-07-16
0,95
CASE OF ZHDANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Locus standi;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibi
CtEDO 2018-07-17
0,95
CASE OF MARIYA ALEKHINA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspec
CtEDO 2019-05-07
0,94
CASE OF MITYANIN AND LEONOV v. RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article
CtEDO 2018-12-18
0,94
CASE OF MURTAZALIYEVA v. RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Preliminary objection allowed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 6+6-3-b - Right to a fa
Sursă