CtEDO 03.09.2015 AI

CASE OF M. AND M. v. CROATIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the European Institute of Romania

RESPONDENT
HRV
HOTĂRÂRE
03.09.2015
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Positive obligations);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2015
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF M. AND M. v. CROATIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the European Institute of Romania (CtEDO, 2015)
HUDOC · oficial

Restul inadmisibil (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate; Încălcare a Articolului 3 - Interdicția torturii (Articolul 3 - Investigație eficace) (Aspect procedural); Nicio încălcare a Articolului 3 - Interdicția torturii (Articolul 3 - Obligații pozitive); Nicio încălcare a Articolului 8 - Dreptul la respect pentru viața privată și familia (Articolul 8 - Obligații pozitive); Încălcare a Articolului 8 - Dreptul la respect pentru viața privată și familia (Articolul 8 - Obligații pozitive; Articolul 8-1 - Respect pentru viața familială; Respect pentru viața privată); Încălcare a Articolului 8 - Dreptul la respect pentru viața privată și familia (Articolul 8-1 - Respect pentru viața familială); Daune moralenice - acordare (Articolul 41 - Daune moralenice)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2015-09-03
0,99
CASE OF M. AND M. v. CROATIA - [Romanian translation] legal summary by the SCM Romania and IER
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Positive obligations);No violation of Article 8
CtEDO 2015-09-03
0,98
CASE OF M. AND M. v. CROATIA
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Positive obligations);No violation of Article 8
CtEDO 2015-09-03
0,97
M. and M. v. Croatia
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Positive obligations);No violation of Article 8
CtEDO 2021-11-18
0,96
CASE OF M.H. AND OTHERS v. CROATIA
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture
CtEDO 2021-11-18
0,95
CASE OF M.H. AND OTHERS v. CROATIA - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture
Sursă