CtEDO 31.10.2019 AI

CASE OF ULEMEK v. CROATIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania

RESPONDENT
HRV
HOTĂRÂRE
31.10.2019
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Effective domestic remedy;(Art 35-1) Four-month period (former six-month);Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2019
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF ULEMEK v. CROATIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania (CtEDO, 2019)
HUDOC · oficial

Excepție preliminară respinsă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-1) Epuizarea căilor de atac interne;(Art. 35-1) Cale de atac intern eficace;(Art 35-1) Perioada de patru luni (fostele șase luni);Rest inadmisibil (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestă lipsă de temei;Încălcarea articolului 3 - Interzicerea torturii (Articolul 3 - Tratament degradant) (Aspect substanțial);Nicio încălcare a articolului 3 - Interzicerea torturii (Articolul 3 - Tratament degradant) (Aspect substanțial);Daune morale - acordare (Articolul 41 - Daune morale;Satisfacție echitabilă)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2019-10-31
0,99
CASE OF ULEMEK v. CROATIA
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Effective domestic remedy;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35
CtEDO 2019-10-31
0,99
CASE OF ULEMEK v. CROATIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Effective domestic remedy;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35
CtEDO 2019-10-31
0,98
Ulemek v. Croatia
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Effective domestic remedy;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35
CtEDO 2016-10-20
0,96
CASE OF MURŠIĆ v. CROATIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 -
CtEDO 2019-10-31
0,95
AFFAIRE ULEMEK c. CROATIE
Exception préliminaire rejetée (Art. 35) Conditions de recevabilité;(Art. 35-1) Épuisement des voies de recours internes;(Art. 35-1) Recours interne effectif;(Art. 35-1) Délai de six mois;Partiellement irrecevable (Art. 35) Conditions de re
Sursă