CtEDO 27.04.2017 AI

CASE OF ZHERDEV v. UKRAINE - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova

RESPONDENT
UKR
HOTĂRÂRE
27.04.2017
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Manifestly ill-founded);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention);No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance;Legal assistance of own choosing;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2017
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF ZHERDEV v. UKRAINE - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova (CtEDO, 2017)
HUDOC · oficial

Restul inadmisibil (Articolul 35-3-a - Manifestă lipsă de temei);

Încălcarea Articolului 3 - Interzicerea torturii (Articolul 3 - Tratament degradant) (Aspect substanțial);

Încălcarea Articolului 3 - Interzicerea torturii (Articolul 3 - Anchetă efectivă) (Aspect procedural);

Încălcarea Articolului 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (Articolul 5-1 - Arrest sau detenție legală);

Încălcarea Articolului 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (Articolul 5-3 - Durata detenției preventive);

Nicio încălcare a Articolului 6+6-3-c - Dreptul la proces echitabil (Articolul 6 - Procedură penală; Articolul 6-1 - Audiență echitabilă) (Articolul 6-3-c - Apărare prin asistență juridică; Asistență juridică la alegere; Articolul 6 - Dreptul la proces echitabil);

Prejudicii nemateriale - acordare (Articolul 41 - Prejudicii nemateriale; Satisfacție echitabilă)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2017-04-27
0,98
CASE OF ZHERDEV v. UKRAINE
Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Manifestly ill-founded);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective i
CtEDO 2017-04-27
0,98
Zherdev v. Ukraine
Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Manifestly ill-founded);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective i
CtEDO 2007-11-27
0,95
POPOVICI v. MOLDOVA - [Romanian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-tria
CtEDO 2019-07-04
0,95
CASE OF KORBAN v. UKRAINE - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by Teodor Papuc
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - P
CtEDO 2012-01-12
0,95
CASE OF TODOROV v. UKRAINE
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detent
Sursă