CtEDO 10.04.2012 AI

CASE OF POPA AND TANASESCU v. ROMANIA - [Romanian Translation] provided by the SCM Romania and Monitorul Oficial R.A.

RESPONDENT
ROU
HOTĂRÂRE
10.04.2012
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6-3-c - Defence in person) (Article 6-3-c - Defence in person;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial);Violation of Article 6+6-3-d - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6-3-d - Examination of witnesses) (Article 6-3-d - Examination of witnesses;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage);Non-pecuniary damage - award
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2012
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF POPA AND TANASESCU v. ROMANIA - [Romanian Translation] provided by the SCM Romania and Monitorul Oficial R.A. (CtEDO, 2012)
HUDOC · oficial

Restul inadmisibil; Încălcarea Articolului 6+6-3-c - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (Articolul 6 - Procedura penală; Articolul 6-1 - Audiere echitabilă; Articolul 6-3-c - Apărare personală) (Articolul 6-3-c - Apărare personală; Articolul 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil); Încălcarea Articolului 6+6-3-d - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (Articolul 6 - Procedura penală; Articolul 6-1 - Audiere echitabilă; Articolul 6-3-d - Examinarea martorilor) (Articolul 6-3-d - Examinarea martorilor; Articolul 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil); Daune patrimoniale - cerere respinsă (Articolul 41 - Daune patrimoniale); Daune morale - acordare

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2012-04-10
0,99
CASE OF POPA AND TANASESCU v. ROMANIA
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6-3-c - Defence in person) (Article 6-3-c - Defence in person;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial
CtEDO 2012-04-10
0,95
AFFAIRE POPA ET TANASESCU c. ROUMANIE
Partiellement irrecevable;Violation de l'article 6+6-3-c - Droit à un procès équitable (Article 6 - Procédure pénale;Article 6-1 - Procés équitable;Article 6-3-c - Se défendre soi-même) (Article 6-3-c - Se défendre soi-même;Article 6 - Droi
CtEDO 2013-01-08
0,94
Bucur and Toma v. Romania
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 38 - Examination of the case and friendly settlement proceedings;Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Violation of Article 6 - Right to
CtEDO 2013-01-08
0,94
CASE OF BUCUR AND TOMA v. ROMANIA - [Romanian Translation] by the SCM Romania and IER
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 38 - Examination of the case-{general} (Article 38 - Obligation to furnish all necessary facilities);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Art
CtEDO 2015-05-19
0,94
CASE OF LUPENI GREEK CATHOLIC PARISH AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA - [Romanian translation] by the SCM Romania and IER
Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Manifestly ill-founded;Ratione materiae);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair tr
Sursă