CtEDO 23.03.2016 Auto

CASE OF BLOKHIN v. RUSSIA

RESPONDENT
RUS
HOTĂRÂRE
23.03.2016
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Six month period);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Article 5-1-d - Educational supervision;Minors);Violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Criminal charge;Fair hearing) (Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial);Violation of Article 6+6-3-d - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Criminal charge;Fair hearing) (Article 6-3-d - Obtain attendance of witnesses;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2016
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF BLOKHIN v. RUSSIA (CtEDO, 2016)
HUDOC · oficial

Obiecții preliminare respinse (art. 35-1 - Epuizarea măsurilor interne;Perioada de șase luni);Încălcarea articoluluiui 3 - Interzicerea torturii (art. 3 - Tratament degradant) (Aspectul substanțial);Încălcarea articoluluiui 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (art. 5-1 - Deprivarea libertății;art. 5-1-d - Supravegherea educațională;Minors);Încălcarea articoluluiui 6+6-3-c - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (art. 6 - Acțiunea penală;art. 6-1 - Audierea penală;Audierea penală) (art. 6-3-c - Apărarea prin asistență juridică;art. 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil);art. 6 - Drept la un proces echitabil);

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2016-03-23
0,99
Blokhin v. Russia [GC]
Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Six month period);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article
CtEDO 2016-03-23
0,98
CASE OF BLOKHIN v. RUSSIA - [Romanian translation] by the SCM Romania and IER
Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (
CtEDO 2013-11-14
0,96
CASE OF BLOKHIN v. RUSSIA
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Art
CtEDO 2013-11-14
0,96
Blokhin v. Russia
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Art
CtEDO 2015-10-15
0,96
CASE OF BELOZOROV v. RUSSIA AND UKRAINE
Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Six month period);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Liberty of person;Security of person;Article 5-1-f - Extradition) (Ukra
Sursă