CtEDO 23.03.2016 AI

CASE OF BLOKHIN v. RUSSIA - [Romanian translation] by the SCM Romania and IER

RESPONDENT
RUS
HOTĂRÂRE
23.03.2016
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Article 5-1-d - Educational supervision;Minors);Violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Criminal charge;Fair hearing) (Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial);Violation of Article 6+6-3-d - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Criminal charge;Fair hearing) (Article 6-3-d - Obtain attendance of witnesses;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2016
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF BLOKHIN v. RUSSIA - [Romanian translation] by the SCM Romania and IER (CtEDO, 2016)
HUDOC · oficial

Obiecții preliminare respinse (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-1) Epuizarea căilor de atac interne;(Art. 35-1) Perioada de șase luni;Încălcarea articolului 3 - Interzicerea torturii (Articolul 3 - Tratament degradant;Tratament inuman) (Aspect substantiv);Încălcarea articolului 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (Articolul 5-1 - Privare de libertate;Articolul 5-1-d - Supraveghere educativă;Minori);Încălcarea articolului 6+6-3-c - Dreptul la proces echitabil (Articolul 6 - Proceduri penale;Articolul 6-1 - Inculpație penală;Audiere echitabilă) (Articolul 6-3-c - Apărare prin asistență juridică;Articolul 6 - Dreptul la proces echitabil);Încălcarea articolului 6+6-3-d - Dreptul la proces echitabil (Articolul 6 - Proceduri penale;Articolul 6-1 - Inculpație penală;Audiere echitabilă) (Articolul 6-3-d - Obținerea prezenței martorilor;Articolul 6 - Dreptul la proces echitabil);Daune nemateriale - acordare (Articolul 41 - Daune nemateriale;Satisfacție echitabilă)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2016-03-23
0,98
CASE OF BLOKHIN v. RUSSIA
Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Six month period);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article
CtEDO 2016-03-23
0,98
Blokhin v. Russia [GC]
Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Six month period);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article
CtEDO 2013-11-14
0,96
CASE OF BLOKHIN v. RUSSIA
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Art
CtEDO 2018-11-15
0,95
CASE OF NAVALNYY v. RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania
Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection
CtEDO 2023-01-24
0,95
CASE OF KUTAYEV v. RUSSIA
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art 35-1) Four-month period (former six-month);Violation of Artic
Sursă