CtEDO 01.06.2006 Auto

CASE OF GRIDIN v. RUSSIA

RESPONDENT
RUS
HOTĂRÂRE
01.06.2006
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Violation of Art. 6-1;Violation of P1-1;Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - financial award;Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2006
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF GRIDIN v. RUSSIA (CtEDO, 2006)
HUDOC · oficial

Reclamantul s-a născut în 1961 și locuiește în Aleksin în regiunea Tula. La 11 octombrie 2001, Curtea de District Sovetskiy din Tula a acordat reclamantului cererea împotriva Departamentului Regional Tula al Serviciului Federal pentru Ocuparea Ocupației și i-a acordat RUR 5.294.69 (197 EUR). La 16 aprilie 2002, Curtea Regională Tula a susținut hotărârea privind recursul. La 23 mai 2002, Curtea de District Sovetskiy a modificat hotărârea, indicând faptul că atribuirea a fost plătită de Ministerul Finanțelor la cheltuirea Trezoreriei. La 12 februarie 2003, Departamentul Regional Tula al Ministerului Finanțelor a solicitat revizuirea supravegherii hotărârii. La 31 august 2004, Curtea Regională Tula a refuzat cererea. La 3 decembrie 2004, Trezoreria a plătit sumele detașate contului bancar al reclamantului.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2006-06-08
0,93
CASE OF PYRIKOV v. RUSSIA
4. The applicant was born in 1949 and lives in the Tula Region. 5. In December 1997 the applicant was dismissed from his position. 6. On 17 December 1997, according to the applicant, and 18 February 1998, according to the Government, the ap
CtEDO 2007-02-15
0,92
CASE OF GORBACHEV v. RUSSIA
5. The applicant was born in 1949 and lives in the town of Aleksin in the Tula Region. 6. On 18 May 1999 the applicant sued his former employer, a private company, for reinstatement, wage arrears and compensation for damage. The acknowledgm
CtEDO 2007-10-04
0,92
CASE OF GALKIN v. RUSSIA
4. The applicant was born in 1939 and lives in Barnaul, the Altay Region. 5. On 20 December 1998 police searched the applicant's house. 6. On 20 June 2000 the Industrialnyy District Court of Barnaul found, upon the applicant's complaint, th
CtEDO 2007-10-11
0,91
CASE OF KRASYUCHENKO v. RUSSIA
4. The applicant was born in 1924 and lives in Voronezh. 5. The applicant sued the local social welfare authority (Комитет по социальной защите населения администрации Советского района г. Воронежа) claiming readjustment of her old-age pens
CtEDO 2008-02-07
0,91
CASE OF GLADYSHEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
4. The applicants were born in 1976, 1973 and 1955 respectively and live in Barnaul, the Altay region. 5. In 1988 and 1990 the applicants obtained several state bonds entitling them to 4 % annual interest and to recovering of their value at
Sursă