CASE OF VOGINS v. LATVIA

CtEDO 2020-10-06 0,90

of Article 35 § 3 (b). (d) Conclusion 32. It follows that this complaint must be declared inadmissible in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (b) and 4 of the Convention. This conclusion obviates the need to consider if other admissibility requ

CtEDO 2012-10-02 0,89

Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-3 - Rights of def

CtEDO 2020-07-07 0,89

35. Accordingly, the Court upholds the Government’s objection and the applicant’s complaint under Article 6 § 1 must therefore be rejected under Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies. For these reasons, the Court, un

CtEDO 2013-03-05 0,89

of all the material in its possession, and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, the Court considers that the remainder of the application does not disclose any appearance of a violation of any of the Articles of

CtEDO 2024-07-18 0,89

Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 14+3 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture;Effecti