Rezoluția CM/ResDH(2013)112 Wieczorek împotriva Poloniei Executarea hotărârii Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului (Recherche n 18176/05, Hotărârea 08/12/2009, definitivă la 08/03/2010) (adoptată de Comitetul de Miniștri la 6 iunie 2013 în cadrul celei de-a 1172-a ședințe a delegaților miniștrilor) Comitetul miniștrilor, în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (2) din Convenția pentru apărarea drepturilor omului și a libertăților fundamentale, care prevede ca Comitetul să supravegheze executarea hotărârilor definitive ale Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului (denumite în continuare "convenția" și "Curtea"), Având în vedere hotărârea definitivă care a fost transmisă de Curte Comitetului în cauza de mai sus și încălcările constatate reamintind obligația statului pârât, în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (1) (1) din Convenție, să se conformeze hotărârilor definitive în litigiile la care este parte și că această obligație implică, pe lângă plata satisfacției echitabile acordate de Curte, adoptarea de către autoritățile din statul membru în cauză, dacă este necesar de măsuri individuale pentru a pune capăt încălcărilor constatate și pentru a elimina consecințele acestora, în măsura posibilului de către Restitutio in integrum; măsuri generale de prevenire a unor încălcări similare; invitând guvernul statului pârât să informeze Comitetul cu privire la măsurile luate pentru a se conforma obligației respective După examinarea bilanțului de acțiune furnizat de guvern care indică măsurile adoptate pentru a executa hotărârile, inclusiv informațiile furnizate în ceea ce privește plata satisfacției echitabile acordate de Curte (a se vedea documentul DH-DD(2013) 436 [1] S DECLARĂ quasures to comply with the judgment in case Wieczorek against Poland Case description Wieczorek, application No. 18176/05, judgment of 08/12/2009, final on 08/03/2010 Această rubrică se referă la Cracow Court of Appeal In the opinie of the European Court, if legial representation was mandatory, the Court of Appeal assessment would be unenecessary, in particular in the absence of any analysis of whether in the circumstances of the case the cassation appeal offered reasonable prospects of succesor, does not seem to be justited. The domestic scurt failed in its duty to give proper examination to the applicant Following the judgment of the European Court, the applicant has a right to make an application for lodging a casation appeal out of time. In these circumstances, no other individual measure appears necessary. II. General Measures The case is similar to the case Tabor v. Poland, application No. 12825/02, in which the Committee has closed its supervision, see CM/ResDH(2011) 239. În aceste circumstanțe, nu further general measure appears necessary. III. Concluzii ale respondent state The Government considers that no individual measures are necessary in the present case and that the general Measures adopted, notably the legislative changes, will be sucient to conclusion that Poland has commised with its obligations under Articol 46, paragraph 1 of the convention in respect to the breach of Article 6, paragraph 1 of the convention. [1] Numai în limba engleză [2] Informații submitted by the Polish authorities on 16 April 2013.
Résolution CM/ResDH(2013)112
Wieczorek contre Pologne
Exécution de l’arrêt de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme
(Requête n
o
18176/05, arrêt du 08/12/2009, définitif le 08/03/2010)
(adoptée par le Comité des Ministres le 6 juin 2013,
lors de la 1172e réunion des Délégués des Ministres)
Le Comité des Ministres, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales, qui prévoit que le Comité surveille l’exécution des arrêts définitifs de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (ci-après nommées «
la Convention
» et «
la Cour
»),
Vu l’arrêt définitif qui a été transmis par la Cour au Comité dans l`affaire ci-dessus et les violations constatées
;
Rappelant l’obligation de l’Etat défendeur, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe
1, de la Convention, de se conformer aux arrêts définitifs dans les litiges auxquels il est partie et que cette obligation implique, outre le paiement de la satisfaction équitable octroyée par la Cour, l’adoption par les autorités de l’Etat défendeur, si nécessaire
:
-
de mesures individuelles pour mettre fin aux violations constatées et en effacer les conséquences, dans la mesure du possible par
restitutio in integrum;
et
-
de mesures générales permettant de prévenir des violations semblables;
Ayant invité le gouvernement de l’Etat défendeur à informer le Comité des mesures prises pour se conformer à l’obligation susmentionnée
;
Ayant examiné le bilan d’action fourni par le gouvernement indiquant les mesures adoptées afin d’exécuter les arrêts y compris les informations fournies en ce qui concerne le paiement de la satisfaction équitable octroyée par la Cour (voir document
)
[1]
;
S’étant assuré que toutes les mesures requises par l’article 46, paragraphe 1, ont été adoptées
;
DECLARE qu’il a rempli ses fonctions en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention dans cette affaire et
DECIDE d’en clore l’examen.
Action Report
[2]
Information about the measures to comply with the judgment
in case Wieczorek against Poland
Case description
Wieczorek, application No. 18176/05, judgment of 08/12/2009, final on 08/03/2010
This case concerns the Cracow Court of Appeal’s refusal in 2004 to grant the applicant legal aid to lodge a cassation appeal on the basis of the assumption that the crucial issue in the case concerned the assessment of the applicant`s condition and that the case did not warrant professional legal assistance for the purpose of further appeal.
In the opinion of the European Court, if legal representation was mandatory, the Court of Appeal’s conclusion that legal assistance would be unnecessary, in particular in the absence of any analysis of whether in the circumstances of the case the cassation appeal offered reasonable prospects of success, does not seem to be justified. The domestic court failed in its duty to give proper examination to the applicant`s request for legal assistance (violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention).
I.
Individual measures
The Court granted the applicant just satisfaction in respect of non-pecuniary damage.
Details of just satisfaction
Pecuniary damage
Non-pecuniary damage
Costs and expenses
Total
-
-
Paid on 23/06/2010
Following the judgment of the European Court, the applicant has a right to make an application for lodging a cassation appeal out of time.
In these circumstances, no other individual measure appears necessary.
II.
General measures
The case is similar to the case
Tabor v. Poland
, application No. 12825/02, in which the Committee has closed its supervision, see CM/ResDH(2011)239.
In these circumstances, no further general measure appears necessary.
III.
Conclusions of the respondent state
The Government considers that no individual measures are necessary in the present case and that the general measures adopted, notably the legislative changes, will be sufficient to conclude that Poland has complied with its obligations under Article 46, paragraph 1 of the Convention in respect to the breach of Article 6, paragraph 1 of the Convention.
[1]
En anglais uniquement
[2]
Information submitted by the Polish authorities on 16 April 2013.