ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 18.02.2014 Auto

CASE OF FERREIRA ALVES v. PORTUGAL

RESPONDENT
PRT
HOTĂRÂRE
18.02.2014
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2014
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
CASE OF FERREIRA ALVES v. PORTUGAL (CtEDO, 2014)
HUDOC · oficial

Reclamantul s-a născut în 1953 și trăiește în Matosinhos (Portugal). La 3 iunie 2005, Consiliul de Etică al lui Porto (Conselho Deontológico do Porto) al Asociației Barierelor Portugheze (Ordem dos Advogados) a instituit proceduri disciplinare împotriva reclamantului, în urma unei plângeri introduse de un client pentru încălcarea secretului profesional la 29 mai 2002. La 4 martie 2011, cazul a fost respins din cauza faptului că faptele erau deja supuse unei decizii în 2009, care au fost renunțate la timp.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2015-04-30
0,97
CASE OF FERREIRA ALVES v. PORTUGAL
4. The applicant, a lawyer, was born in 1953 and lives in Matosinhos. 5. On 22 February 2008 the Porto Ethics Council (Conselho Deontológico do Porto) of the Portuguese Bar Association (Ordem dos Advogados) instituted disciplinary proceedin
CtEDO 2014-01-28
0,91
FERREIRA ALVES v. PORTUGAL
SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 60419/09 Jorge de Jesus FERREIRA ALVES against Portugal The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 28 January 2014 as a Committee composed of: Dragoljub Popović, President, Paulo
CtEDO 2014-07-01
0,90
FERREIRA ALVES AND ALVES v. PORTUGAL
that they do not disclose any appearance of a violation the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols. It follows that this part of the applications is also manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with
CtEDO 2007-06-21
0,89
CASE OF FERREIRA ALVES v. PORTUGAL (No. 3)
the Institute’s report; he alleged a violation of Article 6 of the Convention on that account. 21. On 17 November 2003 the judge ordered that copies of all the medical and social reports be sent to the parties. He also awarded the applicant
CtEDO 2015-04-30
0,89
CASE OF ALVES v. PORTUGAL
that remained outstanding. 14. Between 28 May and 6 November 2009 the parties lodged, in total, three requests to which the judge promptly replied in less than one month. 15. On an unknown date the case was set down for hearing on 10 March
Sursă