ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 17.03.2015 Auto

CASE OF TÓTH v. HUNGARY

RESPONDENT
HUN
HOTĂRÂRE
17.03.2015
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2015
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză 
CASE OF TÓTH v. HUNGARY (CtEDO, 2015)
HUDOC · oficial

Reclamantul s-a născut în 1951 și locuiește în Budakalász. Reclamantul a fost angajat cu un furnizor de servicii de jocuri de noroc de stat pentru mai mult de 20 de ani. La 29 iunie 2010, ocuparea forței de muncă a reclamantului s-a încheiat de comun acord cu efect de la 30 iunie 2010. În temeiul prezentului acord, angajatorul a plătit reclamantului o sumă brută de 21.573.086 forints maghiari (HUF) (aproximativ 18.000 euro (EUR)), sub rezerva sarcinilor salariale. În temeiul noilor legislații (a se vedea punctul 10 de mai jos) plata de indemnizare a fost ulterior taxată la 98% din partea sa depășește 3,5 milioane HUF; impozitul pe venit și contribuțiile de securitate socială deja plătite (a se vedea punctul 7 de mai sus) au fost deduse din impozitul plătibil. Astfel, reclamantul a plătit 10,756,341 HUF suplimentar (aproximativ 34 000 EUR) în impozit special la 3 mai 2011.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2014-09-23
0,95
CASE OF P.G. v. HUNGARY
6. The applicant was born in 1952 and lives in Budapest. 7. In 2006 the applicant concluded an employment contract with a State-owned financial institution. His contract was amended in 2009 stipulating, in case of ordinary dismissal, severa
CtEDO 2015-03-17
0,95
CASE OF MACHER v. HUNGARY
5. The applicant was born in 1953 and lives in Budapest. 6. On 17 August 2009 the applicant was appointed as deputy general manager of a State-owned company limited by shares. 7. The applicant’s employment was terminated by mutual agreement
CtEDO 2015-01-27
0,95
CASE OF SIKUTA v. HUNGARY
6. The applicant was born in 1964 and lives in Budapest. 7. On 1 July 2002 the applicant concluded an employment contract with a State-owned financial institution. 8. On 6 May 2010 the applicant’s employment was terminated by mutual agreeme
CtEDO 2017-11-28
0,93
M.A. v. HUNGARY
In the applicant’s case, this uppermost portion amounted to HUF 2,903,950 (approximately EUR 9,300). The amount deducted as special tax was thus HUF 2,177,963 (approximately EUR 7,000). 6. The remainder of the severance payment was subjecte
CtEDO 2016-07-26
0,93
CASE OF DÉNES v. HUNGARY
4. The applicant was born in 1949 and lives in Budapest. 5. From 1 July 2002 the applicant was employed as a civil servant at the Prime Minister’s Office. Her service was terminated by the employer on 15 May 2010. 6. Under new legislation (
Sursă