ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO

Sursă originală

CtEDO 26.07.2016 Auto

CASE OF DÉNES v. HUNGARY

RESPONDENT

HUN

HOTĂRÂRE

26.07.2016

Pe scurt

Instanță: CtEDO
Concluzie: Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions)

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2016
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro

Citează această cauză

CASE OF DÉNES v. HUNGARY (CtEDO, 2016)

HUDOC · oficial

Reclamantul s-a născut în 1949 și locuiește în Budapesta. Începând cu 1 iulie 2002, reclamantul a fost angajat ca funcționar la Oficiul Primului Ministru. Serviciul ei a fost încheiat de angajatorul la 15 mai 2010. În temeiul noilor legislații (a se vedea punctul 7 de mai jos) plata de lichidare a reclamantului a fost supusă unei taxe speciale la 98% din partea sa depășește 3.500.000 de forinti maghiari (HUF). În consecință, impozitul special a fost perceput pe plata de indemnizare a acesteia în valoare de HUF 5.511.909 (aproximativ 18.400 euro (EUR)).

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2014-09-23

CASE OF P.G. v. HUNGARY

6. The applicant was born in 1952 and lives in Budapest. 7. In 2006 the applicant concluded an employment contract with a State-owned financial institution. His contract was amended in 2009 stipulating, in case of ordinary dismissal, severa

CtEDO 2015-03-17

CASE OF MACHER v. HUNGARY

5. The applicant was born in 1953 and lives in Budapest. 6. On 17 August 2009 the applicant was appointed as deputy general manager of a State-owned company limited by shares. 7. The applicant’s employment was terminated by mutual agreement

CtEDO 2015-03-17

CASE OF TÓTH v. HUNGARY

5. The applicant was born in 1951 and lives in Budakalász. 6. The applicant was employed with a State-owned gambling service provider for more than 20 years. 7. On 29 June 2010 the applicant’s employment was terminated by mutual agreement w

CtEDO 2015-01-27

CASE OF SIKUTA v. HUNGARY

6. The applicant was born in 1964 and lives in Budapest. 7. On 1 July 2002 the applicant concluded an employment contract with a State-owned financial institution. 8. On 6 May 2010 the applicant’s employment was terminated by mutual agreeme

CtEDO 2017-11-28

M.A. v. HUNGARY

In the applicant’s case, this uppermost portion amounted to HUF 2,903,950 (approximately EUR 9,300). The amount deducted as special tax was thus HUF 2,177,963 (approximately EUR 7,000). 6. The remainder of the severance payment was subjecte

Sursă