ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO

Sursă originală

CtEDO 17.03.2015 Auto

CASE OF MACHER v. HUNGARY

RESPONDENT

HUN

HOTĂRÂRE

17.03.2015

Pe scurt

Instanță: CtEDO
Concluzie: Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions)

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2015
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro

Citează această cauză

CASE OF MACHER v. HUNGARY (CtEDO, 2015)

HUDOC · oficial

Reclamantul s-a născut în 1953 și locuiește în Budapesta. La 17 august 2009, reclamantul a fost desemnat ca administrator general adjunct al unei societăți de stat limitate de acțiuni. Angajamentul reclamantului a fost încheiat de comun acord la 30 august 2010. În temeiul prezentului acord, reclamantul a primit o plată de indemnizare, sub rezerva sarcinilor salariale. În temeiul noilor legislații (a se vedea punctul 9 de mai jos) plata de indemnizare a fost ulterior taxată la 98% din partea sa depășește 3,5 milioane de forints maghiari (HUF); impozitul pe venit și contribuțiile de securitate socială deja plătite (a se vedea punctul 7 de mai sus) au fost deduse din impozitul plătibil. Astfel, reclamantul a plătit o taxă specială suplimentară HUF 1.492.898 (aproximativ 4.700 euro (EUR) la 5 septembrie 2011.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2015-03-17

CASE OF TÓTH v. HUNGARY

5. The applicant was born in 1951 and lives in Budakalász. 6. The applicant was employed with a State-owned gambling service provider for more than 20 years. 7. On 29 June 2010 the applicant’s employment was terminated by mutual agreement w

CtEDO 2014-09-23

CASE OF P.G. v. HUNGARY

6. The applicant was born in 1952 and lives in Budapest. 7. In 2006 the applicant concluded an employment contract with a State-owned financial institution. His contract was amended in 2009 stipulating, in case of ordinary dismissal, severa

CtEDO 2015-01-27

CASE OF SIKUTA v. HUNGARY

6. The applicant was born in 1964 and lives in Budapest. 7. On 1 July 2002 the applicant concluded an employment contract with a State-owned financial institution. 8. On 6 May 2010 the applicant’s employment was terminated by mutual agreeme

CtEDO 2017-11-28

M.A. v. HUNGARY

In the applicant’s case, this uppermost portion amounted to HUF 2,903,950 (approximately EUR 9,300). The amount deducted as special tax was thus HUF 2,177,963 (approximately EUR 7,000). 6. The remainder of the severance payment was subjecte

CtEDO 2016-07-26

CASE OF DÉNES v. HUNGARY

4. The applicant was born in 1949 and lives in Budapest. 5. From 1 July 2002 the applicant was employed as a civil servant at the Prime Minister’s Office. Her service was terminated by the employer on 15 May 2010. 6. Under new legislation (

Sursă