CtEDO 23.03.2016 Auto

CASE OF F.G. v. SWEDEN - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the European Institute of Romania

RESPONDENT
SWE
HOTĂRÂRE
23.03.2016
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Iran);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Iran);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Iran);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Iran);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2016
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF F.G. v. SWEDEN - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the European Institute of Romania (CtEDO, 2016)
HUDOC · oficial

Rezistarea inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;Nici o încălcare a articolului 2 - Dreptul la viață (art. 2 - Expulsie) (Condițională) (Iran);Nici o încălcare a articolului 3 - Interzicerea torturei (art. 3 - Expulsie) (Condițională) (Iran);Încălcarea articoluluiui 2 - Dreptul la viață (art. 2 - Expulsie) (Condițională) (Iran);Încălcarea articoluluiui 3 - Interzicerea torturii (art. 3 - Expulsie) (Condițională) (Iran); Prejudiciu material - cerere respinsă (art. 41 - Prejudiciu material;Dar satisfacție)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2015-09-03
0,93
CASE OF M. AND M. v. CROATIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the European Institute of Romania
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Positive oblig
CtEDO 2016-04-26
0,93
CASE OF AMARANDEI AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA - [Romanian translation] by the SCM Romania and IER
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violatio
CtEDO 2016-07-12
0,93
CASE OF R.M. AND OTHERS v. FRANCE
Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Russia);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect
CtEDO 2021-11-04
0,93
CASE OF PETROSYAN v. AZERBAIJAN
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Viol
CtEDO 2016-07-12
0,93
R.M. and Others v. France
Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Russia);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect
Sursă