CASE OF S.C. ECOLOGICAL CENTER S.A. v. ROMANIA

CtEDO 2014-09-17 0,88

Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Six-month period;Article 35-3-a - Continuing situation);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (

CtEDO 2016-11-22 0,88

, the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the case. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out

CtEDO 2017-09-05 0,88

the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols. It follows that these complaints are manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Cour

CtEDO 2018-11-13 0,88

In the light of all the material in its possession, and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, the Court finds that they do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the applicant’s rights under Article 6 of t

CtEDO 2024-04-16 0,88

. Bulgaria, no. 12853/03, §§ 89-96, 2 December 2010, Bursa Barosu Başkanlığı and Others v. Turkey, no. 25680/05, §§ 106-129, 19 June 2018, and Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v. Switzerland [GC], no. 53600/20, §§ 590-625, 9 April