ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO

Sursă originală

CtEDO 26.04.2016 Auto

CASE OF BAȘBİLEN v. TURKEY

RESPONDENT

TUR

HOTĂRÂRE

26.04.2016

Pe scurt

Instanță: CtEDO
Concluzie: Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2016
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX

Citează această cauză

CASE OF BAȘBİLEN v. TURKEY (CtEDO, 2016)

HUDOC · oficial

Reclamanții s-au născut în 1953 și, respectiv, 1950 și trăiesc în Ankara. Ei sunt părinții dlui Hüseyin Bașbilen, care a fost inginer care lucrează pentru Aselsan, un antreprenor de apărare care produce tehnologie pentru Forțele Armate Turce. La 4 august 2006, la prânz, soția dlui Hüseyin Bașbilen a informat poliția că soțul ei a dispărut de dimineață. La 5 august 2006, la ora 9:00, primarul satului Aydıncık, în districtul Altındağ, în Ankara, a informat gendarmeria că era o mașină în apropierea cimitirului satului. Când gendarmeria a sosit la locul faptei la ora 9:30, au găsit cadavrul lui Hüseyin Bașbilen în mașină.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2014-11-24

BAȘBİLEN v. TURKEY

Communicated on 24 November 2014 SECOND SECTION Application no. 35872/08 Vehbi BAŞBİLEN and Keziban BAŞBİLEN against Turkey lodged on 17 July 2008 STATEMENT OF FACTS The applicants, Mr Vehbi Başbilen and Ms Keziban Başbilen, are Turkish nat

CtEDO 2012-10-09

ÖZSÜREN v. TURKEY

1. The applicants, whose particulars are set out in the appendix, are Turkish nationals. They are the parents and siblings of Mr Muhittin Özsüren who disappeared in 1998. The applicants were represented before the Court by Mr Öztekin Erdönm

CtEDO 2005-05-31

CASE OF AKDENIZ v. TURKEY

9. The applicant, a Turkish citizen of Kurdish origin, was born in 1955 and lives in Diyarbakır. 10. The facts of the case, particularly concerning events which took place on 20 February 1994, are disputed by the parties. 11. The facts as p

CtEDO 2017-01-05

1. The applicant, Ms İmihan Öz, is a Turkish national who was born in 1960 and lives in Malatya. She was represented before the Court by Mr M. Eryaman, a lawyer practising in Ankara. 3. On 13 March 2007 the applicant’s son Murat Öz, a const

CtEDO 2009-10-06

CASE OF SEYFETTİN ACAR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

Government. It was also decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility (Article 29 § 3). THE FACTS THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5. The applicants were born in 1945, 1967, 1945, 1953, 1957 and 1959, r

Sursă