CtEDO 17.05.2016 Auto

CASE OF McINNES v. SERBIA

RESPONDENT
SRB
HOTĂRÂRE
17.05.2016
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Enforcement proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2016
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză
CASE OF McINNES v. SERBIA (CtEDO, 2016)
HUDOC · oficial

Reclamantul s-a născut în 1963 și locuiește în Cres Salisbury East, Australia. La 19 martie 1985, reclamantul a avut leziuni într-un accident de trafic cauzat de vehiculele deținute de Danilo Bošković A.D. - Grdelica și Srbijatrans – Niš, ambele societăți deținute de stat/societate (debitorii). La 23 noiembrie 2001 și 1 iulie 2008, Primul Tribunal Municipal de la Belgrad a dictat două hotărâri separate prin care debitorii au ordonat să plătească reclamantului anumite sume ca compensare pentru daunele susținute. Datorită neîndeplinirii obligațiilor de la aceste decizii, reclamantul a prezentat cereri de executare. La 7 octombrie 2005 și, respectiv, 18 octombrie 2010, Primul Tribunal Municipal de la Belgrad a emis ordine de aplicare în acest sens. Procedurile de punere în aplicare sunt încă în așteptare și deciziile de mai sus rămân neexecute.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2016-09-27
0,90
CASE OF VUKOSAVLJEVIĆ v. SERBIA
5. The applicant was born in 1962 and lives in Velika Reka. 6. He was employed by Holding Kompanija “Komgrap” – DD “Komgrap gradnja”, a socially-owned company based in Belgrade (hereinafter “the debtor”). 7. On 3 February 2006, the First Be
CtEDO 2017-11-07
0,90
CASE OF JOKSIMOVIĆ v. SERBIA
THIRD SECTION CASE OF JOKSIMOVIĆ v. SERBIA (Application no. 37929/10) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 7 November 2017 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Joksimović v. Serbia, The European Court of Human R
CtEDO 2014-01-14
0,90
CASE OF PREMOVIĆ v. SERBIA
4. The applicant was born in 1951 and lives in Novi Pazar. 5. The applicant was employed by “Raška Holding Kompanija A.D. u restrukturiranju”, a socially/State-owned company based in Novi Pazar (hereinafter – “the debtor”). 6. On 22 Decembe
CtEDO 2016-06-28
0,90
CASE OF SKORIĆ v. SERBIA
5. The applicant was born in 1948 and lives in Belgrade. 6. The applicant was employed by “PIM – bagerovanje i vodni transport”, a socially-owned company based in Belgrade (“the debtor”). 7. On 30 March 2005 the Belgrade Second Municipal Co
CtEDO 2016-04-19
0,90
CASE OF BUGARIĆ v. SERBIA
5. The applicant was born in 1957 and lives in Novi Pazar. 6. She was employed by DP “Raška Holding Kompanija” AD, a socially-owned company based in Novi Pazar (hereinafter “the debtor”). 7. On 30 June 2004, 25 September 2009 and 21 Decembe
Sursă