CABRAL v. THE NETHERLANDS - [Dutch Translation] summary by the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs

CtEDO 2018-08-28 0,89

THIRD SECTION CASE OF CABRAL v. THE NETHERLANDS (Application no. 37617/10) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 28 August 2018 FINAL 28/11/2018 This judgment has become final under Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision. I

CtEDO 2016-06-28 0,89

Communicated on 28 June 2016 THIRD SECTION Application no 37617/10 Euclides CABRAL against the Netherlands lodged on 25 June 2010 The facts and complaints in this application have been summarised in the Court’s decision, which is available

CtEDO 2021-06-22 0,88

, § 49, ECHR 2002 ‐ X). 47. Accordingly, the application is manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Declares the application inad

CtEDO 2016-02-09 0,88

concludes that the applicant did not have an “arguable claim”, and that therefore Article 13 is inapplicable to the case. 41. It follows that this complaint must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention. D.

CtEDO 2020-06-04 0,88

Resolution CM/ResDH(2020)72 Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Cabral against Netherlands (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 4 June 2020 at the 1377 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies) Application No.