ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 26.07.2016 Auto

CASE OF VEIGA DA SILVA BRAGA v. PORTUGAL

RESPONDENT
PRT
HOTĂRÂRE
26.07.2016
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2016
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
CASE OF VEIGA DA SILVA BRAGA v. PORTUGAL (CtEDO, 2016)
HUDOC · oficial

Faptele cazului, astfel cum au fost prezentate de părți, pot fi rezumate după cum urmează. La 6 mai 2011, reclamantul a introdus o procedură de punere în aplicare împotriva fostului său soț în fața Curții de Familie Braga, care solicită plata sprijinului pentru copii de 3,600 euro (EUR). La 27 februarie 2013, reclamantul a fost notificat că fostul său soț nu avea active atașabile. La 12 iunie 2015, procedurile au fost extinse deoarece nu au fost specificate activele atașabile în temeiul articolului 750 § 2 din Codul de Procedură Civilă (a se vedea punctul 8 de mai jos).

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2010-03-04
0,89
CASE OF CRUZ DA SILVA COELHO AGAINST PORTUGAL
that the striking-out of a case which has been declared admissible is effected by means of a judgment which the Court forwards to the Committee of Ministers once it has become final in order to allow it to supervise, in accordance with Arti
CtEDO 2024-01-16
0,89
CASE OF VEIGA CARDOSO v. PORTUGAL
REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, Declares the application admissible; Holds that there has been a violation of Article 10 of the Convention; Holds that the finding of a violation constitutes in itself sufficient just satisfaction for any no
CtEDO 2001-10-15
0,88
CASE OF BARBOSA ARAUJO AGAINST PORTUGAL
the applicant 800 000 Portuguese escudos in respect of non-pecuniary damage and 250 000 Portuguese escudos in respect of costs and expenses as soon as the judgment is delivered; Recalling that Rule 44, paragraph 2, of the Rules of the Court
CtEDO 2016-04-26
0,88
CASE OF CUNHA MARTINS DA SILVA COUTO v. PORTUGAL
, 25 days 2 levels of jurisdiction EUR 15,275 (fifteen thousand two hundred and seventy five euros) EUR 500 (five hundred euros) 69374/13 30/10/2013 20/02/2009 Still pending according to the last information received by the Court on 26/05/2
CtEDO 2002-06-24
0,88
SILVA GOMES AND OTHERS AGAINST PORTUGAL
the date of this decision, it being understood that the interest would accrue from the expiry of the time-limit until full payment was placed at the disposal of the applicants; Whereas the Committee of Ministers invited the government of th
Sursă