CtEDO 13.09.2016 AI

CASE OF IBRAHIM AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova

RESPONDENT
GBR
HOTĂRÂRE
13.09.2016
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence) (Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial);Violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Criminal charge;Fair hearing) (Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2016
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF IBRAHIM AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova (CtEDO, 2016)
HUDOC · oficial

Restul inadmisibil; Nicio încălcare a Articolului 6+6-3-c - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (Articolul 6 - Procedura penală; Articolul 6-1 - Audiență echitabilă; Articolul 6-3 - Drepturile apărării) (Articolul 6-3-c - Apărare prin asistență juridică; Articolul 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil); Încălcare a Articolului 6+6-3-c - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (Articolul 6 - Procedura penală; Articolul 6-1 - Acuzație penală; Audiență echitabilă) (Articolul 6-3-c - Apărare prin asistență juridică; Articolul 6-3 - Drepturile apărării; Articolul 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil); Daune patrimoniale - cererea respinge (Articolul 41 - Daune patrimoniale; Satisfacție echitabilă); Daune morale - cererea respinge (Articolul 41 - Daune morale; Satisfacție echitabilă)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2016-09-13
0,98
CASE OF IBRAHIM AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence) (Article 6-3-c - Defence through l
CtEDO 2016-09-13
0,98
CASE OF IBRAHIM AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM - [Romanian translation] by the SCM Romania and IER
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence) (Article 6-3-c - Defence through l
CtEDO 2016-09-13
0,97
CASE OF IBRAHIM AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence) (Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance;Article 6 - Right
CtEDO 2016-09-13
0,96
Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC]
Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence) (Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance;Article 6 - Right
CtEDO 2018-04-12
0,94
CASE OF CHIM AND PRZYWIECZERSKI v. POLAND - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Tribunal established by law);No violation of Article 6 - R
Sursă