CtEDO 12.01.2016 AI

CASE OF BOACĂ AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania

RESPONDENT
ROU
HOTĂRÂRE
12.01.2016
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);No violation of Article 14+3 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Prohibition of torture);Violation of Article 14+3 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture;Effective investigation);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2016
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF BOACĂ AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania (CtEDO, 2016)
HUDOC · oficial

Celelalte inadmisibile (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;Încălcarea articolului 3 - Interzicerea torturii (articolul 3 - Tratament degradant) (Substanțial aspect);Încălcarea articolului 3 - Interzicerea torturii (articolul 3 - Investigație eficace) (Procedural aspect);Fără încălcarea articolului 14+3 - Interzicerea discriminării (articolul 14 - Discriminare) (articolul 3 - Tratament degradant;Interzicerea torturii);Încălcarea articolului 14+3 - Interzicerea discriminării (articolul 14 - Discriminare) (articolul 3 - Interzicerea torturii;Investigație eficace);Prejudiciu moral - acordare (articolul 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Satisfacție echitabilă)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2016-04-26
0,96
CASE OF AMARANDEI AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA - [Romanian translation] by the SCM Romania and IER
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violatio
CtEDO 2016-04-26
0,96
CASE OF AMARANDEI AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violatio
CtEDO 2021-06-01
0,96
CASE OF ASSOCIATION ACCEPT AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discriminatio
CtEDO 2018-10-16
0,95
CASE OF LINGURAR AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);No violation of Article 14+3 -
CtEDO 2021-06-01
0,95
CASE OF ASSOCIATION ACCEPT AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discriminatio
Sursă