CtEDO 04.06.2019 AI

CASE OF SIGURÐUR EINARSSON AND OTHERS v. ICELAND - [Romanian Translation] by the SCM Romania and IER

RESPONDENT
ISL
HOTĂRÂRE
04.06.2019
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal);No violation of Article 6+6-3-b - Right to a fair trial (Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6-3-b - Adequate facilities;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial);No violation of Article 6+6-3-d - Right to a fair trial (Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6-3-d - Obtain attendance of witnesses;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2019
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF SIGURÐUR EINARSSON AND OTHERS v. ICELAND - [Romanian Translation] by the SCM Romania and IER (CtEDO, 2019)
HUDOC · oficial

Restul inadmisibil (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate; Încălcarea Articolului 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (Articolul 6 - Proceduri penale; Articolul 6-1 - Tribunal imparțial); Nicio încălcare a Articolului 6+6-3-b - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (Articolul 6-1 - Audiență echitabilă) (Articolul 6-3-b - Facilitățile adecvate; Articolul 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil); Nicio încălcare a Articolului 6+6-3-d - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (Articolul 6-1 - Audiență echitabilă) (Articolul 6-3-d - Obținerea prezenței martorilor; Articolul 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil); Prejudicii nemateriale - constatarea încălcării este suficientă (Articolul 41 - Prejudicii nemateriale; Satisfacție echitabilă)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2016-09-13
0,95
CASE OF IBRAHIM AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM - [Romanian translation] by the SCM Romania and IER
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence) (Article 6-3-c - Defence through l
CtEDO 2016-09-13
0,94
CASE OF IBRAHIM AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence) (Article 6-3-c - Defence through l
CtEDO 2020-05-28
0,94
CASE OF EVERS v. GERMANY - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by Teodor Papuc
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair
CtEDO 2020-05-28
0,94
CASE OF EVERS v. GERMANY - [German Translation] by the German Federal Government
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair
CtEDO 2016-05-31
0,94
CASE OF A.N. v. LITHUANIA - [Romanian translation] by the SCM Romania and IER
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Articl
Sursă