CtEDO 20.10.2016 AI

CASE OF MURŠIĆ v. CROATIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania

RESPONDENT
HRV
HOTĂRÂRE
20.10.2016
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2016
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF MURŠIĆ v. CROATIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania (CtEDO, 2016)
HUDOC · oficial

Obiecția preliminară respingă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-1) Epuizarea căilor de atac interne;Violarea Articolului 3 - Interzicerea torturii (Articolul 3 - Tratament degradant) (Aspectul substantiv);Nicio violaredocumentelor Articolului 3 - Interzicerea torturii (Articolul 3 - Tratament degradant) (Aspectul substantiv);Nicio violară a Articolului 3 - Interzicerea torturii (Articolul 3 - Tratament degradant) (Aspectul substantiv);Daune extrapatrimoniale - acordare (Articolul 41 - Daune extrapatrimoniale;Satisfacție echitabilă)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2019-10-31
0,96
CASE OF ULEMEK v. CROATIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Effective domestic remedy;(Art 35-1) Four-month period (former six-month);Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibilit
CtEDO 2019-10-31
0,96
CASE OF ULEMEK v. CROATIA
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Effective domestic remedy;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35
CtEDO 2019-10-31
0,96
Ulemek v. Croatia
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Effective domestic remedy;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35
CtEDO 2019-10-31
0,95
CASE OF ULEMEK v. CROATIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Effective domestic remedy;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35
CtEDO 2023-05-02
0,95
CASE OF S.P. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - [Croatian Translation] summary by the Office of the representative of the Republic of Croatia
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment;Positive ob
Sursă