ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO

Sursă originală

CtEDO 08.12.2016 Auto

CASE OF KOLBASOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

RESPONDENT

RUS

HOTĂRÂRE

08.12.2016

Pe scurt

Instanță: CtEDO
Concluzie: Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy)

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2016
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro

Citează această cauză

CASE OF KOLBASOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (CtEDO, 2016)

HUDOC · oficial

Lista reclamanților și detaliile relevante ale cererilor sunt prezentate în tabelul apendice. Reclamanții se plângeau de condițiile inadecvate de detenție. În aplicații nos. 37198/09, 29657/10 și 14181/15 reclamanții au formulat, de asemenea, alte plângeri în temeiul dispozițiilor Convenției. După ce a studiat termenii declarațiilor unilaterale ale guvernului formulate în unele cazuri, Curtea consideră că declarațiile propuse nu constituie o bază suficientă pentru a concluziona că respectarea drepturilor omului nu impune ca acesta să continue examinarea acestor cereri. Prin urmare, declarațiile sunt respinse.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2016-11-24

CASE OF KOLEVATOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

THIRD SECTION CASE OF KOLEVATOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 47696/10, 62151/10, 17790/11, 35535/12, 44590/12, 29586/13, 33709/13, 50624/13 and 2959/15) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 24 November 2016 This judgment is final but it may be su

CtEDO 2016-11-24

CASE OF ALEKSANDROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

insofar as they concern the conditions of the applicants’ detention. 13. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike this part of the applicants out of the list. III. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW 14. The ap

CtEDO 2018-01-18

BELYKH AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

the threshold of severity required to characterise the treatment as inhuman or degrading within the meaning of Article 3 of the Convention. In view of the above, the Court finds that the complaints about the conditions of detention as descr

CtEDO 2017-03-30

GORBUNOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

cases regarding conditions of detention the burden of proof may, under certain circumstances, be shifted to the authorities (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII; see also Mathew v. the Netherlands, no. 24919/03, §

CtEDO 2016-09-15

WALICHNIEWICZ AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

the date when the applicants lodged their first letter with the Court, but rather the date when they sent the completed application form to it, which was on 12 September 2009 for application no. 23617/09 and on 23 January 2012 for applicati

Sursă