ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 10.10.2017 Auto

CASE OF PALİTKIRAN v. TURKEY

RESPONDENT
TUR
HOTĂRÂRE
10.10.2017
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal;Independent tribunal)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2017
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză 
CASE OF PALİTKIRAN v. TURKEY (CtEDO, 2017)
HUDOC · oficial

Reclamantul s-a născut în 1989 și trăiește în Manisa. Faptele cazului, astfel cum au fost prezentate de părți, pot fi rezumate după cum urmează. La 7 iulie 2009, reclamantul a fost respins de la Școala de Expert Gendarmerie din cauza nerespectării normelor disciplinare. La 28 iulie 2009, reclamantul a interzis o acțiune în fața Curții Supreme de Administrație Militară și a solicitat anularea deciziei de a-l respinge. La 6 ianuarie 2010, Curtea Supremă de Administrație Militară a respins cazul reclamantului, ținând seama de „documentele secrete” prezentate de Ministerul Apărării. Aceste documente nu au fost comunicate reclamantului. 10. La 5 mai 2010, cererea de rectificare a reclamantului a fost respinsă de aceeași instanță.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2017-06-13
0,94
CASE OF TUNÇ v. TURKEY
5. The applicant was born in 1965 and lives in Ankara. 6. The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 7. On 13 April 2010 the applicant was dismissed from his post as an officer in the army due to non-c
CtEDO 2017-11-28
0,94
CASE OF ÜÇEL v. TURKEY
5. The applicant was born in 1985 and lives in Denizli. 6. On 13 June 2009 the applicant was dismissed from the Expert Gendarmerie School due to non-compliance with disciplinary rules. Subsequently, he initiated proceedings before the Supre
CtEDO 2017-11-14
0,93
CASE OF YİVLİ v. TURKEY
5. The applicant was born in 1979 and lives in Hatay. 6. The applicant was an officer in the Army. Based on classified investigation reports, his contract was terminated. He had no access to the classified reports. On 8 June 2009 the applic
CtEDO 2017-12-12
0,93
CASE OF KAYA v. TURKEY
4. The applicant was born in 1966 and lives in Diyarbakır. 5. The applicant was an officer in the Army. On 1 August 1989, relying on classified investigation reports, the applicant’s contract was terminated and he was dismissed from his off
CtEDO 2017-11-28
0,93
CASE OF BİLGİÇ v. TURKEY
5. The applicant was born in 1987 and lives in Bursa. 6. On 26 April 2006 the applicant was dismissed from the Air Force non-commissioned officer vocational high school due to non-compliance with admission pre-conditions. On 22 June 2006 th
Sursă