ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 14.11.2017 Auto

CASE OF YİVLİ v. TURKEY

RESPONDENT
TUR
HOTĂRÂRE
14.11.2017
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal;Independent tribunal)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2017
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
CASE OF YİVLİ v. TURKEY (CtEDO, 2017)
HUDOC · oficial

Reclamantul s-a născut în 1979 și locuiește în Hatay. Reclamantul a fost un ofiţer în armată. Pe baza rapoartelor de anchetă clasificate, contractul său a fost încheiat. Nu avea acces la rapoartele clasificate. La 8 iunie 2009, reclamantul a inițiat o procedură împotriva Ministerului Apărării cu Curtea Supremă Administrativă Militară pentru anularea deciziei impugnate. În baza rapoartelor de anchetă clasificate, precum și avizul scris al procurorului public, care nu a fost comunicat reclamantului, la 16 martie 2010, Curtea Supremă de Administrație Militară a respins cazul reclamantului. La 18 mai 2010, cererea reclamantului de rectificare a fost, de asemenea, respinsă de Curtea Supremă Administrativă Militară. Decizia finală a fost notificată reclamantului la 8 iunie 2010.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2017-12-12
0,95
CASE OF KAYA v. TURKEY
4. The applicant was born in 1966 and lives in Diyarbakır. 5. The applicant was an officer in the Army. On 1 August 1989, relying on classified investigation reports, the applicant’s contract was terminated and he was dismissed from his off
CtEDO 2017-06-13
0,94
CASE OF TUNÇ v. TURKEY
5. The applicant was born in 1965 and lives in Ankara. 6. The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 7. On 13 April 2010 the applicant was dismissed from his post as an officer in the army due to non-c
CtEDO 2017-10-10
0,93
CASE OF PALİTKIRAN v. TURKEY
5. The applicant was born in 1989 and lives in Manisa. 6. The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 7. On 7 July 2009 the applicant was dismissed from the Expert Gendarmerie School due to non-complian
CtEDO 2017-11-28
0,93
CASE OF ÖZSOY AND YILDIRIM v. TURKEY
5. The applicants were born in 1987 and 1986 respectively and live in Ankara. 6. The applicants were cadets in military schools. Based on classified investigation reports, they were expelled from their schools. None of the applicants had ac
CtEDO 2017-06-13
0,93
CASE OF AKGÜL v. TURKEY
may be summarised as follows. 7. On 26 May 2010 the applicant was dismissed from his post as an officer in the army due to non-compliance with disciplinary rules. 8. On 22 June 2010 the applicant brought an action before the Supreme Militar
Sursă