ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO

Sursă originală

CtEDO 28.11.2017 Auto

CASE OF ÜÇEL v. TURKEY

RESPONDENT

TUR

HOTĂRÂRE

28.11.2017

Pe scurt

Instanță: CtEDO
Concluzie: Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal;Independent tribunal)

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2017
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX

Citează această cauză

CASE OF ÜÇEL v. TURKEY (CtEDO, 2017)

HUDOC · oficial

Reclamantul s-a născut în 1985 și locuiește în Denizli. La 13 iunie 2009, reclamantul a fost respins de la Școala de Expert Gendarmerie din cauza nerespectării normelor disciplinare. Ulterior, el a inițiat proceduri în fața Curții Supreme de Administrație Militară și a solicitat anularea deciziei de concediere. La 15 aprilie 2009, Curtea Supremă de Administrație Militară a respins cererea reclamantului, ținând seama de „documentele secrete” prezentate de Ministerul Apărării. Aceste documente nu au fost comunicate reclamantului. Această decizie a fost acordată reclamantului la 7 mai 2009.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2017-06-13

CASE OF TUNÇ v. TURKEY

5. The applicant was born in 1965 and lives in Ankara. 6. The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 7. On 13 April 2010 the applicant was dismissed from his post as an officer in the army due to non-c

CtEDO 2017-10-10

CASE OF PALİTKIRAN v. TURKEY

5. The applicant was born in 1989 and lives in Manisa. 6. The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 7. On 7 July 2009 the applicant was dismissed from the Expert Gendarmerie School due to non-complian

CtEDO 2017-11-28

CASE OF BİLGİÇ v. TURKEY

5. The applicant was born in 1987 and lives in Bursa. 6. On 26 April 2006 the applicant was dismissed from the Air Force non-commissioned officer vocational high school due to non-compliance with admission pre-conditions. On 22 June 2006 th

CtEDO 2017-11-14

CASE OF YİVLİ v. TURKEY

5. The applicant was born in 1979 and lives in Hatay. 6. The applicant was an officer in the Army. Based on classified investigation reports, his contract was terminated. He had no access to the classified reports. On 8 June 2009 the applic

CtEDO 2017-11-28

CASE OF ÖZSOY AND YILDIRIM v. TURKEY

5. The applicants were born in 1987 and 1986 respectively and live in Ankara. 6. The applicants were cadets in military schools. Based on classified investigation reports, they were expelled from their schools. None of the applicants had ac

Sursă