ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO

Sursă originală

CtEDO 28.11.2017 Auto

CASE OF BİLGİÇ v. TURKEY

RESPONDENT

TUR

HOTĂRÂRE

28.11.2017

Pe scurt

Instanță: CtEDO
Concluzie: Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal;Independent tribunal)

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2017
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX

Citează această cauză

CASE OF BİLGİÇ v. TURKEY (CtEDO, 2017)

HUDOC · oficial

Reclamantul s-a născut în 1987 și locuiește în Bursa. La 26 aprilie 2006, reclamantul a fost respins de la liceul profesional necomisat al Forței Aeriene din cauza nerespectării condițiilor precondiționale de admitere. La 22 iunie 2006, reclamantul a interzis o acțiune în fața Curții Supreme de Administrație Militară și a solicitat anularea deciziei de concediere. La 23 mai 2007, Curtea Supremă de Administrație Militară a respins cererea reclamantului, ținând seama de „documentele secrete” prezentate de Ministerul Apărării. Aceste documente nu au fost comunicate reclamantului. Această decizie a fost transmisă reclamantului la 5 iunie 2007.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2017-06-13

CASE OF TUNÇ v. TURKEY

5. The applicant was born in 1965 and lives in Ankara. 6. The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 7. On 13 April 2010 the applicant was dismissed from his post as an officer in the army due to non-c

CtEDO 2017-11-28

CASE OF ÜÇEL v. TURKEY

5. The applicant was born in 1985 and lives in Denizli. 6. On 13 June 2009 the applicant was dismissed from the Expert Gendarmerie School due to non-compliance with disciplinary rules. Subsequently, he initiated proceedings before the Supre

CtEDO 2017-10-10

CASE OF PALİTKIRAN v. TURKEY

5. The applicant was born in 1989 and lives in Manisa. 6. The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 7. On 7 July 2009 the applicant was dismissed from the Expert Gendarmerie School due to non-complian

CtEDO 2017-11-14

CASE OF YİVLİ v. TURKEY

5. The applicant was born in 1979 and lives in Hatay. 6. The applicant was an officer in the Army. Based on classified investigation reports, his contract was terminated. He had no access to the classified reports. On 8 June 2009 the applic

CtEDO 2011-05-31

CASE OF KELOĞLAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

nts, who are former military students, were born in 1988, 1987 and 1991 respectively and live in Ankara, Kocaeli and Adana. 5. On different dates the applicants were expelled from military schools following disciplinary decisions, which hel

Sursă