ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO

Sursă originală

CtEDO 28.11.2017 Auto

CASE OF ÖZSOY AND YILDIRIM v. TURKEY

RESPONDENT

TUR

HOTĂRÂRE

28.11.2017

Pe scurt

Instanță: CtEDO
Concluzie: Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal;Independent tribunal)

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2017
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro

Citează această cauză

CASE OF ÖZSOY AND YILDIRIM v. TURKEY (CtEDO, 2017)

HUDOC · oficial

Reclamanții s-au născut în 1987 și, respectiv, în 1986 și trăiesc în Ankara. Solicitanţii erau cadeţi în şcolile militare. Pe baza rapoartelor de anchetă clasificate, au fost expulzaţi din şcolile lor. Niciunul dintre reclamanții nu a avut acces la aceste rapoarte clasificate. Toate au depus acțiuni împotriva Ministerului Apărării la Curtea Supremă Administrativă Militară pentru a anula deciziile impugnate. Având în vedere rapoartele de anchetă clasificate, Curtea Supremă Administrativă Militară a respins cererile reclamanților și cererile ulterioare de rectificare în date diferite, prezentate în detaliu în lista atașată.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2017-11-14

CASE OF ÜNAL AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

4. The applicants were cadets in military schools. Based on classified investigation reports, they were expelled from their schools. None of the applicants had access to these classified reports. They all filed actions against the Ministry

CtEDO 2017-11-14

CASE OF YİVLİ v. TURKEY

5. The applicant was born in 1979 and lives in Hatay. 6. The applicant was an officer in the Army. Based on classified investigation reports, his contract was terminated. He had no access to the classified reports. On 8 June 2009 the applic

CtEDO 2017-12-12

CASE OF KAYA v. TURKEY

4. The applicant was born in 1966 and lives in Diyarbakır. 5. The applicant was an officer in the Army. On 1 August 1989, relying on classified investigation reports, the applicant’s contract was terminated and he was dismissed from his off

CtEDO 2017-11-28

CASE OF ÜÇEL v. TURKEY

5. The applicant was born in 1985 and lives in Denizli. 6. On 13 June 2009 the applicant was dismissed from the Expert Gendarmerie School due to non-compliance with disciplinary rules. Subsequently, he initiated proceedings before the Supre

CtEDO 2017-10-10

CASE OF PALİTKIRAN v. TURKEY

5. The applicant was born in 1989 and lives in Manisa. 6. The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 7. On 7 July 2009 the applicant was dismissed from the Expert Gendarmerie School due to non-complian

Sursă