ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO

Sursă originală

CtEDO 14.11.2017 Auto

CASE OF ÜNAL AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

RESPONDENT

TUR

HOTĂRÂRE

14.11.2017

Pe scurt

Instanță: CtEDO
Concluzie: Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2017
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro

Citează această cauză

CASE OF ÜNAL AND OTHERS v. TURKEY (CtEDO, 2017)

HUDOC · oficial

Solicitanţii erau cadeţi în şcolile militare. Pe baza rapoartelor de anchetă clasificate, au fost expulzaţi din şcolile lor. Niciunul dintre reclamanții nu a avut acces la aceste rapoarte clasificate. Toate au depus acțiuni împotriva Ministerului Apărării la Curtea Supremă Administrativă Militară pentru a anula deciziile impugnate. Având în vedere rapoartele de anchetă clasificate, Curtea Supremă Administrativă Militară a respins cererile reclamanților și cererile ulterioare de rectificare în date diferite, prezentate în detaliu în lista atașată.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2017-11-28

CASE OF ÖZSOY AND YILDIRIM v. TURKEY

5. The applicants were born in 1987 and 1986 respectively and live in Ankara. 6. The applicants were cadets in military schools. Based on classified investigation reports, they were expelled from their schools. None of the applicants had ac

CtEDO 2017-11-28

CASE OF ÜÇEL v. TURKEY

5. The applicant was born in 1985 and lives in Denizli. 6. On 13 June 2009 the applicant was dismissed from the Expert Gendarmerie School due to non-compliance with disciplinary rules. Subsequently, he initiated proceedings before the Supre

CtEDO 2017-11-14

CASE OF YİVLİ v. TURKEY

5. The applicant was born in 1979 and lives in Hatay. 6. The applicant was an officer in the Army. Based on classified investigation reports, his contract was terminated. He had no access to the classified reports. On 8 June 2009 the applic

CtEDO 2017-12-12

CASE OF YUMUȘAK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

of the Rules of Court. 4. The Government objected to the examination of the application by a Committee. After having considered the Government’s objection, the Court rejects it. THE FACTS I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5. The applicants w

CtEDO 2017-11-28

CASE OF İNAN v. TURKEY

. He had no access to the classified reports. On 8 September 2008 the applicant initiated proceedings against the Ministry of Defence with the Supreme Military Administrative Court to have annulment of the impugned decision. 6. Relying on t

Sursă