IRMAK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

Comunicat la 9 aprilie 2019 SECȚIUNE Cerere nr. 18036/19 Nilüfer IRMAK și alții împotriva Turciei depusă la 2 aprilie 2019 DECLARAREA FACTELOR Cererea se referă la dispariția Erkan Irmak, ruda reclamanților, după presupusa răpire de persoane necunoscute la 16 februarie 2019 și la afirmațiile de lipsa unei anchete eficace asupra dispariției sale. Reclamanții (a se vedea tabelul adăugat) se bazează pe articolele 2, 3 și 5 din Convenție. Reclamanții au epuizat toate căile de recurs interne eficace, în conformitate cu art. 35 § 1 din Convenție? În special, cererea individuală la Curtea Constituțională este un remediu eficace în sensul articolului 35 § 1 din Convenție în ceea ce privește plângerile reclamanților în temeiul articolelor 2, 3 și 5 din Convenție?

Dreptul la viață al rudei reclamanților, asigurat de art. 2 din Convenție, a fost încălcat în acest caz? În special, a fost răpit de către agenți ai statului? În conformitate cu obligațiile procedurale și pozitive în temeiul articolului 2 din Convenție, autoritățile au efectuat o investigație eficientă și au luat măsurile necesare pentru a găsi rudele reclamanților pentru a-și salva viața (a se vedea Salman c. Turcia [GC], nr. 2886/93, §104, CEDH 2000 VII, și Osmanoğlu c. Turcia , nr. 48804/99, §§§ 71 și 84, 24 ianuarie 2008)? În acest sens: 3.

Communicated on 9 April 2019

SECOND SECTION

Application no. 18036/19 Nilüfer IRMAK and Others against Turkey lodged on 2 April 2019

STATEMENT OF FACTS

The application concerns the disappearance of Erkan Irmak, the applicants’ relative, following his alleged abduction by unknown persons on 16 February 2019 and the allegations of a lack of an effective investigation into his disappearance. The applicants (see appended table) rely on Articles 2, 3 and 5 of the Convention.

QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES

1. Have the applicants exhausted all effective domestic remedies, as required by Article 35 § 1 of the Convention? In particular, is the individual application to the Constitutional Court an effective remedy within the meaning of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention in respect of the applicants’ complaints under Articles 2, 3 and 5 of the Convention? 2. Was the right to life of the applicants’ relative, ensured by Article 2 of the Convention, violated in the present case? In particular, was he abducted by agents of the State? 3. In accordance with the procedural and positive obligations under Article 2 of the Convention, have the authorities carried out an effective investigation and taken the necessary measures available to them to find the applicants’ relative in order to safeguard his life (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, §104, ECHR 2000 ‑ VII, and Osmanoğlu v. Turkey , no. 48804/99, §§ 71 and 84, 24 January 2008)? In this connection: 3.1.

What steps are being taken by the investigating authorities, in particular by the relevant prosecutors, in order to find the applicants’ relative who, according to the applicants, was abducted in Ümraniye, Istanbul? 3.2. Has the footage of the surveillance cameras in the surrounding area of the crime scene been secured and analysed? 3.3. What action has been taken by Ümraniye District Security Directorate concerning the applicants’ request, dated 1 March 2019, for the securing of the data of certain surveillance cameras? Were their recordings secured and analysed? If your reply is in the affirmative, has there been any follow-up on those leads? 3.4. Has it been possible to identify the perpetrators’ images from the footage?

If your reply is in the affirmative, has there been any follow-up on those leads? 3.5. Have the authorities examined the crime scene, identified witnesses to the incident and collected their statements? If your reply is in the affirmative, has there been any follow-up on those leads? 4. Has there been a violation of Article 5 of the Convention on account of the disappearance of the applicants’ relative? ( Çiçek v. Turkey , no. 25704/94 , §164, 27 February 2001). The Government are requested to submit a copy of the investigation file. APPENDIX No. First name Last name Birth year Nationality Place of residence Representative 1 Nilüfer Irmak 1975 Turkish Istanbul S. Yıldırım 2 Beyhan Irmak 1950 Turkish Istanbul S. Yıldırım 3 Emine Irmak 1954 Turkish Istanbul S. Yıldırım 4 Neslihan Özer 1980 Turkish Istanbul S. Yıldırım