ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 07.12.2006 Auto

CASE OF RAISA TARASENKO v. UKRAINE

RESPONDENT
UKR
HOTĂRÂRE
07.12.2006
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Art. 6-1;Violation of Art. 13;Non-pecuniary damage - financial award;Pecuniary damage - Government to enforce the judgment debt
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2006
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
CASE OF RAISA TARASENKO v. UKRAINE (CtEDO, 2006)
HUDOC · oficial

Reclamantul s-a născut în 1941 și locuiește în orașul Dniprodzerzhynsk. La 1 august 1999, soțul reclamantului a murit din cauza vinei unui angajat al Dniprodzerzhynskelektrotrans Municipal Enterprise. La 3 septembrie 2001, Curtea de district Bagaliyskiy din Dniprodzerzhynsk a ordonat societății să plătească reclamantul UAH 5.825.90 în compensare. La 26 iunie 2002, Serviciul Zavodskiy District Bailiffs a întrerupt procedura de executare din cauza lipsei de fonduri a debitorului și refuzul reclamantului de a lua proprietatea debitorului în loc de bani. La 17 iunie 2003, societatea a fost declarată faliment și procedurile de lichidare au fost inițiate împotriva acesteia. Hotărârea rămâne neexecută. 10. Legislația internă relevantă este rezumat în hotărârea Romașov v. Ucraina (nu. 67534/01, §§ 16-18, 27 iulie 2004).

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2007-04-26
0,93
CASE OF KOLOSENKO v. UKRAINE
THE FACTS I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4. The applicant was born in 1951 and resides in the town of Dniprodzerzhynsk, the Dnipropetrovsk region, Ukraine. 5. On 12 October 2000 the Zavodskyy District Court of Dniprodzerzhynsk awarded the
CtEDO 2006-12-07
0,93
CASE OF VIKTOR TARASENKO v. UKRAINE
THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4. The applicant was born in 1954 and resides in the town of Novovolynsk, Volyn region, Ukraine. 5. In November 2000 the applicant instituted proceedings in the Novovolynskyy Town Court against his former emplo
CtEDO 2005-12-15
0,92
CASE OF KUCHERENKO v. UKRAINE
merits (Rule 59 § 1). 5. On 1 November 2004 the Court changed the composition of its Sections (Rule 25 § 1). This case was assigned to the newly composed Third Section (Rule 52 § 1). THE FACTS 6. The applicant was born in 1936 and currently
CtEDO 2007-12-13
0,92
CASE OF KACHANOV v. UKRAINE
4. The applicant was born in 1960 and lives in Shakhtаrsk, the Donetsk region. 5. On 20 October 2000 the Shakhtаrsk City Court (Шахтарський міський суд Донецької області) awarded the applicant 4,815.28 hryvnyas (UAH) in salary arrears and c
CtEDO 2009-03-12
0,92
CASE OF LEBEDINTSEVA v. UKRAINE
4. The applicant was born in 1949 and lives in the city of Kharkiv, Ukraine. 5. On 21 February 2001 the Snizhne Court awarded the applicant 23,536.80 Ukrainian hryvnyas (UAH) against the State-owned Udarnik mine in compensation for her husb
Sursă