ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO

Sursă originală

CtEDO 02.10.2008 Auto

CASE OF ANATOLIY VLADIMIROVICH ZAKHAROV v. RUSSIA

RESPONDENT

RUS

HOTĂRÂRE

02.10.2008

Pe scurt

Instanță: CtEDO
Concluzie: Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2008
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro

Citează această cauză

CASE OF ANATOLIY VLADIMIROVICH ZAKHAROV v. RUSSIA (CtEDO, 2008)

HUDOC · oficial

Reclamantul s-a născut în 1939 și locuiește în Okha, un oraș din regiunea Sakhalin. Reclamantul a deținut un apartament într-o casă decrepit. Consiliul local a decis să demoleze casa, iar la 27 iunie 2000, reclamantul a depus în judecată un apartament de înlocuire. La 28 octombrie 2003, Tribunalul Okha a ordonat consiliului să furnizeze reclamantului un apartament din Okha de aceeași calitate ca apartamentul său demolat. Această hotărâre a devenit obligatorie la 24 februarie 2004, dar nu a fost niciodată pusă în aplicare. În temeiul articolului 9 din Legea Federală privind procedurile de executare din 21 iulie 1997, un judecător trebuie să pună în aplicare o hotărâre în termen de două luni.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2008-09-25

CASE OF ANTONOVA v. RUSSIA

4. The applicant was born in 1962 and lives in Yakutsk, a town in Yakutia. 5. The applicant’s father and his family of three (including the applicant) lived in a council flat under the threat of collapse. On 16 November 1998 the Yakutsk Tow

CtEDO 2008-07-24

CASE OF VIKTOR PETROV v. RUSSIA

binding on 9 January 2004 and was enforced on 8 July 2005. 11. On 1 June 2005 the Town Court ordered the applicant to be provided in 2005 with a decent flat of at least 65 m2. This judgment became final on 15 June 2005 and was enforced on 2

CtEDO 2008-06-26

CASE OF PETUKHOV v. RUSSIA

4. The applicant was born in 1949 and lives in Kirov. 5. In August 1997 the applicant was mistreated by the police. He brought two civil actions against them. 6. On 29 March 2000 and 9 January 2001 the Oktyabrskiy District Court of Kirov he

CtEDO 2008-07-31

CASE OF SUKHORUKOV v. RUSSIA

4. The applicant was born in 1953 and lives in Ust-Labinsk, a town in the Krasnodar Region. 5. On 31 March 1999 the Ust-Labinskiy District Court awarded the applicant 2,000 Russian roubles against a local welfare authority for a delayed pay

CtEDO 2008-10-02

CASE OF ZUBAREV v. RUSSIA

4. The applicant was born in 1937 and lives in Obninsk, a town in the Kaluga Region. 5. As a victim of Chernobyl, the applicant was entitled to benefits. Considering himself underpaid, he sued the local welfare authority. 6. On 19 March 200

Sursă