ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO

Sursă originală

CtEDO 09.12.2008 Auto

CASE OF SHIREBY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

RESPONDENT

GBR

HOTĂRÂRE

09.12.2008

Pe scurt

Instanță: CtEDO
Concluzie: Violation of Article 14+P1-1 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property)

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2008
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro

Citează această cauză

CASE OF SHIREBY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (CtEDO, 2008)

HUDOC · oficial

Reclamantul s-a născut în 1955 și locuiește în Sheffield. Soția sa a murit la 3 aprilie 2001. Cererea sa pentru beneficiile văduvelor a fost făcută în iunie 2001. La 22 iunie 2001, reclamantul a fost informat că are dreptul la alocarea părintelor văduvi („WPA”). Cu toate acestea, la 14 ianuarie 2002, el a fost informat că el nu are dreptul la o plată de lichidare din cauza faptului că beneficiile nu existau la momentul decesului soției reclamantei. Reclamantul nu a apelat după cum a considerat sau a fost sfătuit că un astfel de remediu ar fi obligat să eșueze deoarece nu sunt plătite astfel de prestații de securitate socială văduvilor în temeiul legislației din Marea Britanie. Legislația și practicile interne relevante sunt descrise în hotărârea Curții în cazul Willis v. Regatul Unit, nr. 36042/97, §§ 1426, CEDO 2002-IV.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2009-02-03

CASE OF MITCHARD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

5. The applicant was born in 1956 and lives in Oxford. 6. His wife died on 12 October 1996 leaving dependent children. His claim for widows’ benefits was made in March 2001 and on 2 May 2001 it was determined that he was entitled to Widowed

CtEDO 2009-02-03

CASE OF TURNER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

5. The applicant was born in 1954 and lives in Liverpool. 6. His wife died on 3 February 2001 leaving dependent children. His claim for widows’ benefits under the new scheme was made on 30 April 2001 and was rejected on 9 May 2001 on the gr

CtEDO 2008-06-24

SYKES v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

(“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr C. Whomersley of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. A. The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. The applicant’s

CtEDO 2008-03-11

PEACOCK v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

the applicant was informed that his claim had been disallowed as he was not a woman. The applicant did not appeal further as he considered or was advised that such a remedy would be bound to fail since no such social security benefit was pa

CtEDO 2008-09-02

HARRISON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

Mr C. Whomersley of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. A. The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. The applicant’s wife died on 26 November 1998. His claim for widows’

Sursă