Rezoluția CM/ResDH(2012)204 [1] Begu împotriva României Executarea hotărârii Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului (Recherche n 20448/02, Hotărârea din 15 martie 2011, definitivă la 15 iunie 2011) Comitetul miniștrilor, în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (2) din Convenția pentru apărarea drepturilor omului și a libertăților fundamentale, care prevede că el supraveghează executarea hotărârilor definitive ale Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului (denumite în continuare "menționate mai jos " Convenția" și "Curtea"), Având în vedere hotărârea definitivă, care a fost transmisă de către Curte Comitetului în cauza de mai sus și încălcările constatate (a se vedea documentul DH-DD(2012) 486E) ; reamintind obligația statului pârât în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (1) (1) din Convenție, să se conformeze hotărârilor definitive în litigiile la care este parte și că această obligație implică, pe lângă plata satisfacției echitabile acordate de Curte, adoptarea de către autoritățile din statul membru în cauză, dacă este necesar de măsuri individuale pentru a pune capăt încălcărilor constatate și pentru a elimina consecințele acestora, în măsura posibilului de către Restitutio in integrum ; și măsuri generale de prevenire a unor încălcări similare ; Am invitat guvernul statului pârât să informeze Comitetul cu privire la măsurile luate pentru a se conforma obligațiilor menționate anterior După examinarea bilanțului de acțiune furnizat de guvern care indică măsurile adoptate în vederea executării hotărârii judecătorești, inclusiv informațiile furnizate în ceea ce privește plata satisfacției echitabile acordate de Curte (a se vedea documentul DH-DD(2012) 486E) ; și având în vedere faptul că au fost adoptate toate măsurile impuse prin art. 46 alineatul (1), DECLAMENTUL PE CARE își îndeplinește funcțiile în temeiul art. 46 alin. (2) din Convenție în această cauză și DECIDE d . eport [2] Begu (Application No. 20448/02, judgment March 2011, final June 2011) ctory su The caseta's the încălcarea Articol the Convention, for lack documentation September 2001 until hisconvinge on 7 June 2002 and the încălcarea Articol of the First Protocol adițional to the Convention for the seizure of personal goods during the house search, goods which subsequently were not confiscated by the Courts nor returned in the appicants posesie. II. Individual meas the nt has been convicted two yea Impresionant nt. According Article the Criminal Code, the entire length the pre-trial ntion was deducted from his sentince. was released 1st 2003 after having served his sentince (see par. the judgment). Cu privire la restitution the 16d good the Government asset that the applicant has e possibility lodging request with the Prosecutors Office the bazis Article 109 the Code Criminal Procedure. The Prosecutor Electroluxs Office confirmă faptul că aplicantul ar trebui să fie înlocuit. The Court awarded the aplicant just satisfaction for the moral prejudice suffered as a c nsequ the breach Convention. The Romanian State paid the applicant the amount 200 EUR for ne-pecuniary damages and 1 000 EUR for costs and xpenses incurred during the proceseedings. III. General Measures With view încălcarea art. 5 the Convention, regarding the lack of sucient justice for the appicants pre-trial detention between 14 September 2001 and 7 June 2002, the Government remind that this aspect is examined in the context of the Calmanovici Group of cazs of ar icle Prima Protocol Suplimental the Convention se referă la Government would like point out that thefacts which cauzand the violation of these provisions do not represent a general situation, but a singular situation which was determined by the domestic pendes Therefore, the Government consider that the publicity and disemination of the Court It was also publicshed in the Official Journal on 26 April 2012. IV. Concluzii Having privition to the aforetioned submissions, the Government consider that no other individualal or general measures are to be taken and they conclusion that they compliment with the obligation for the Article 46 § 1 of the Convention, kindly asking for the execution proceedings of the Court Adoptată de Comitetul de Miniștri la 6 decembrie 2012 în cadrul celei de-a 1157-a reuniuni a delegaților miniștrilor. [2] Numai în limba engleză.
Résolution CM/ResDH(2012)204
[1]
Begu contre Roumanie
Exécution de l’arrêt de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme
(Requête n
o
20448/02, arrêt du 15 mars 2011, définitif le 15 juin 2011)
Le Comité des Ministres, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales, qui prévoit qu’il surveille l’exécution des arrêts définitifs de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (ci-après nommées «
la Convention
» et «
la Cour
»),
Vu l’arrêt définitif, qui a été transmis par la Cour au Comité dans l’affaire ci-dessus et les violations constatées (voir document
) ;
Rappelant l’obligation de l’Etat défendeur, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe
1, de la Convention, de se conformer aux arrêts définitifs dans les litiges auxquels il est partie et que cette obligation implique, outre le paiement de la satisfaction équitable octroyée par la Cour, l’adoption par les autorités de l’Etat défendeur, si nécessaire
:
-
de mesures individuelles pour mettre fin aux violations constatées et en effacer les conséquences,
dans la mesure du possible par
restitutio in integrum
; et
-
de mesures générales permettant de prévenir des violations semblables ;
Ayant invité le gouvernement de l’Etat défendeur à informer le Comité des mesures prises pour se conformer aux obligations susmentionnées
;
Ayant examiné le bilan d’action fourni par le Gouvernement indiquant les mesures adoptées afin d’exécuter l’arrêt y compris les informations fournies en ce qui concerne le paiement de la satisfaction équitable octroyée par la Cour (voir document
) ;
S’étant assuré que toutes les mesures requises par l’article 46, paragraphe 1, ont été adoptées
;
DECLARE qu’il a rempli ses fonctions en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention dans cette affaire et
DECIDE d’en clore l’examen.
A
c
t
i
o
n
r
eport
[2]
Begu
v
.
R
om
a
n
ia
(Application
No. 20448/02,
judgment
of
15
March
2011,
final
on
15
June
2011)
I.
In
t
r
od
u
ctory su
m
m
a
ry
of
t
he
c
a
s
e
The
case
concerns
the violation
of
Article
5
§
3
of
the
Convention,
for
lack
of
justification
of
the applicant’s pre-trial detention after 14 September 2001 until his conviction on 7 June 2002 and the violation
of
Article
1
of the
First
Protocol
additional to the Convention for the seizure of personal goods during the house search, goods which subsequently were not confiscated by the courts nor returned in the applicant’s possession.
II.
Individual measures
The
ap
p
l
i
c
a
nt has
been
convicted
to
two
yea
r
s
imprison
me
nt.
According
to
Article
88
of
the Criminal
Code,
the
entire
length
of
the
pre-trial
de
t
e
ntion
was
deducted
from
his
sentence.
He
was released
on
1st
J
u
l
y
2003
after
having
served
his
sentence
(see
par.
59
of
the
judgment).
With
regard
t
o
the
restitution
of
the
seized
good
s
,
the
Government
assert
that
the
applicant
has
t
h
e possibility
of
lodging
a
request
with
the
Prosecutor’s
Office
on
the
basis
of
Article
109
§
4
of
the Code
of
Criminal
Procedure.
The
Prosecutor’s
Office
confirmed
the
fact
that
the
applicant
could obtain
the
r
e
stitution
of
the
afore
me
ntioned
goods
if
he
filed
a
petition
in
this
respect.
So
far.
the applicant did not express any interest in claiming the seized goods.
The Court awarded the
applicant just satisfaction
for the moral prejudice
suffered as a c
o
nsequ
e
n
c
e
of
the
breach
of
t
h
e
Convention.
The
Romanian
State
paid
the
applicant
the
amount
of
5
200
EUR
for
non-pecuniary
damages
and 1
000
EUR
for
costs and
e
xpenses
incurred
during
the
proceedings.
III.
General measures
With
a
view
to
t
h
e
violation
of
Article 5
§
3
of
the
Convention,
regarding
the lack of sufficient justification for the applicant’s pre-trial detention between 14 September 2001 and 7 June 2002, the Government remind that this aspect is examined in the context of the Calmanovici group
of cas
e
s.
I
n
s
ofar
as
A
r
t
icle
1
of
the First Protocol additional
to
the
Convention
is
concerne
d
,
the
Government would
like
t
o
point
out
that
the
facts
which
caused the violation of these provisions do not represent a general situation, but a singular situation which was determined by the domestic courts’ failure to apply Article 109 § 4 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to the applicant’s case. Therefore, the Government consider that the publication and dissemination of the Court’s judgment are sufficient general measures that could prevent similar violations.
The Court’s judgment was widely disseminated, as it was listed on the website of the Superior Council of the Magistracy at
www.csm1909.ro
and it can be studied by any interested person. It was also published in the Official Journal on 26 April 2012.
IV.
Conclusions
Having regard to the aforementioned submissions, the Government consider that no other individual or general measures are to be taken and they conclude that they complied with the obligation imposed by Article 46 § 1 of the Convention, kindly asking for the execution proceedings of the Court’s judgment of 15 March 2011 in the case Begu v. Romania to be decided as completed.
[1]
Adoptée par le Comité des Ministres le 6 décembre 2012 lors de la 1157e réunion des Délégués des Ministres.
[2]
En anglais uniquement.