AFFAIRE ERKUȘ CONTRE LA TURQUIE

Rezoluția CM/ResDH(2012)223 [1] Erkuș/Turcia Executarea hotărârii Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului (solicitarea nr. 30366/03, Hotărârea din 29/09/2009, definitivă la 29/12/2009) Comitetul miniștrilor, în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (2) din Convenția pentru apărarea drepturilor omului și a libertăților fundamentale, care prevede că el supraveghează executarea hotărârilor definitive ale Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului (denumite în continuare "menționate mai jos " Convenția" și "Curtea"), Având în vedere hotărârea definitivă, care a fost transmisă de Curte Comitetului în cauza de mai sus și încălcarea constatată (a se vedea documentul DH-DD(2012)896E care reamintește obligația de a se adresa Tribunalului, în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (3) (1) din Convenție, să se conformeze hotărârilor definitive în litigiile la care este parte și că această obligație implică, pe lângă plata satisfacției echitabile acordate de Curte, adoptarea de către autoritățile din statul membru în cauză, dacă este necesar de măsuri individuale pentru a pune capăt încălcărilor constatate și pentru a elimina consecințele acestora, în măsura posibilului de către Restitutio in integrum ; și măsuri generale de prevenire a unor încălcări similare ;

Am invitat guvernul statului pârât să informeze Comitetul cu privire la măsurile luate pentru a se conforma obligațiilor menționate anterior După examinarea bilanțului de acțiune furnizat de guvern care indică măsurile adoptate în vederea executării hotărârii judecătorești, inclusiv informațiile furnizate în ceea ce privește plata satisfacției echitabile acordate de Curte (a se vedea documentul DH-DD(2012)896E SÕ, asigurându-se că au fost adoptate toate măsurile prevăzute la art. 46 alineatul (1); DECLAMENTUL pe care l-a îndeplinit în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (2) din Convenție în această cauză și DECIDE d.n.: examinarea.

Execution of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Erkuș v Turkey (30326/03) Acțiune Report submitted by the Turkey on 18 August 2011 [2] Case Descriere The applicant, who was a conscript at the time of the events, was deprived of his liberty unlawfuly for a period of 17 days before being brought before a judge after his arrest on suspecte of being an army deserter (Violation of Art.5§1). B. Individual measures: Justice: the just satisfaction award has been paid. Other individual measures: Since the aplicant is no longer detained, no other individual measure has been required. C. General Measures: Publication: This case has been translated into Turkish and publicityshed on the official intranet (TSK-NET) of the Ministry of Defence.

on 07.01.2010, in an official letter, the said ministry informed all the military tribunals and prosecutors of the publicity of the present case on TSK-NET. Disemination: This case has been diseminated to the support authorities, namely, the Constitutional Court, the Court of Cassation, the Prosecutor of the Court of Cassation, the Ministry of Interior, the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Justice, the Military Court of Cassation and the Administrative Military High Court. The detention of the applicant for a total of 17 days before briging el before a judge was not based on any of the Legislative provisions in force at the time in question. According to the provisions, at the material time, the period of custody could not exceed 48 hours.

Therefore, the violation found in the present case reals, infact, that it an izolated incident resulting from an erroreous administrative act. In addition, section 80 § 3 of the Law on the Constitution of Military Courts and Criminal Procedure was amended by Law No. 5530 of 29 June 2006, which provided that the time in custody shall not exceed twenty-four hours, exclus the time necessary to transfer the detainee to the nearest military scurt, and that the time necessary for transfer could not be more than twelve hours. Through this amendment the legislation in question has now come into conformity with the European Convention on Human Rights and with the case-law of the Court. The government considers that taking into account the new legislation and disemination of the case-law, the Measures adopted will prevent similar viols and Turkey has compliment with its obligations under 46, paragraph 1, of the convention.

[1] Adoptată de Comitetul de Miniștri la 6 decembrie 2012 cu ocazia celei de-a 1157-a reuniuni a Delegaților miniștrilor. [2] Numai în limba engleză

Résolution CM/ResDH(2012)223 [1] Erkuș contre Turquie Exécution de l’arrêt de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (Requête n o 30326/03, arrêt du 29/09/2009, définitif le 29/12/2009) Le Comité des Ministres, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales, qui prévoit qu’il surveille l’exécution des arrêts définitifs de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (ci-après nommées « la Convention » et « la Cour »), Vu l’arrêt définitif, qui a été transmis par la Cour au Comité dans l’affaire ci-dessus et la violation constatée (voir document DH-DD(2012)896E ) ; Rappelant l’obligation de l’Etat défendeur, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 1, de la Convention, de se conformer aux arrêts définitifs dans les litiges auxquels il est partie et que cette obligation implique, outre le paiement de la satisfaction équitable octroyée par la Cour, l’adoption par les autorités de l’Etat défendeur, si nécessaire : - de mesures individuelles pour mettre fin aux violations constatées et en effacer les conséquences, dans la mesure du possible par restitutio in integrum ; et - de mesures générales permettant de prévenir des violations semblables ; Ayant invité le gouvernement de l’Etat défendeur à informer le Comité des mesures prises pour se conformer aux obligations susmentionnées ;

Ayant examiné le bilan d’action fourni par le Gouvernement indiquant les mesures adoptées afin d’exécuter l’arrêt y compris les informations fournies en ce qui concerne le paiement de la satisfaction équitable octroyée par la Cour (voir document DH-DD(2012)896E ) ; S’étant assuré que toutes les mesures requises par l’article 46, paragraphe 1, ont été adoptées ; DECLARE qu’il a rempli ses fonctions en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention dans cette affaire et DECIDE d’en clore l’examen. Execution of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Erkuș v Turkey (30326/03) Action Report submitted by the Turkey on 18 August 2011 [2] Case Description The applicant, who was a conscript at the time of the events, was deprived of his liberty unlawfuly for a period of 17 days before being brought before a judge after his arrest on suspicion of being an army deserter (Violation of Art.5§1).

B. Individual measures: Just satisfaction: The just satisfaction award has been paid. Other individual measures: Since the applicant is no longer detained, no other individual measure has been required. C. General measures: Publication: This case has been translated into Turkish and published on the official intranet (TSK-NET) of the Ministry of Defence. On 07.01.2010, in an official letter, the said ministry informed all the military tribunals and prosecutors of the publication of the present case on TSK-NET. Dissemination: This case has been disseminated to the relevant authorities, namely, the Constitutional Court, the Court of Cassation, the Prosecutor of the Court of Cassation, the Ministry of Interior, the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Justice, the Military Court of Cassation and the Administrative Military High Court.

Other general measures: The detention of the applicant for a total of 17 days before bringing him before a judge was not based on any of the legislative provisions in force at the time in question. According to the provisions, at the material time, the period of custody could not exceed 48 hours. Therefore, the violation found in the present case reveals, in fact, that it was an isolated incident resulting from an erroneous administrative act. In addition, section 80 § 3 of the Law on the Constitution of Military Courts and Criminal Procedure was amended by Law no. 5530 of 29 June 2006, which provided that the time in custody shall not exceed twenty-four hours, excluding the time necessary to transfer the detainee to the nearest military court, and that the time necessary for transfer could not be more than twelve hours.

Through this amendment the legislation in question has now come into conformity with the European Convention on Human Rights and with the case-law of the Court. The government considers that taking into account the new legislation and dissemination of the case-law, the measures adopted will prevent similar violations and Turkey has thus complied with its obligations under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention. [1] Adoptée par le Comité des Ministres le 6 décembre 2012 lors de la 1157e réunion des Délégués des Ministres. [2] En anglais uniquement