TUNCER v. TURKEY - [Turkish Translation] by the Turkish Ministry of Justice

CtEDO 2018-05-29 0,90

the Court finds that the applicants’ complaints concerning the inadequacy of the judicial response in the aftermath of the incident are manifestly ill ‐ founded and must be declared inadmissible within the meaning of Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 o

CtEDO 2018-12-04 0,90

respondent Government’s declaration under Article 6 of the Convention and of the modalities for ensuring compliance with the undertakings referred to therein; Decides to strike that part of the application out of its list of cases in accord

CtEDO 2020-10-20 0,90

complaint has not been raised by the applicant before the Court, even in substance. Accordingly, this part of the application is manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention. For

CtEDO 2013-01-22 0,90

SECOND SECTION Application no. 31446/09 İsmet TUNCER against Turkey lodged on 2 June 2009 The facts and complaints in this case have been summarised in the Court’s partial decision on admissibility, which is available in HUDOC. QUESTIONS 1.

CtEDO 2021-09-14 0,90

Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Remain