AFFAIRE ŁASZKIEWICZ CONTRE LA POLOGNE

Rezoluția CM/ResDH(2013)85 Łaszkiewicz împotriva Poloniei Executarea hotărârii Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului (Recherche n 28481/03, Hotărârea din 15/01/2008, definitivă la 15/04/2008) (adoptată de Comitetul de Miniștri la 7 mai 2013, în cadrul celei de-a 1170-a ședințe a delegaților miniștrilor) Comitetul miniștrilor, în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (2) din Convenția pentru apărarea drepturilor omului și a libertăților fundamentale, care prevede ca Comitetul să supravegheze executarea hotărârilor definitive ale Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului (denumite în continuare "convenția" și "Curtea"), Având în vedere hotărârea definitivă care a fost transmisă de Curte Comitetului în cauza de mai sus și încălcările constatate reamintind obligația statului pârât, în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (1) (1) din Convenție, să se conformeze hotărârilor definitive în litigiile la care este parte și că această obligație implică, pe lângă plata satisfacției echitabile acordate de Curte, adoptarea de către autoritățile din statul membru în cauză, dacă este necesar de măsuri individuale pentru a pune capăt încălcărilor constatate și pentru a elimina consecințele acestora, în măsura posibilului de către Restitutio in interum de măsuri generale de prevenire a unor încălcări similare ; După ce a invitat guvernul din statul membru pârât să informeze Comitetul cu privire la măsurile luate pentru a se conforma obligației respective care au examinat bilanțul de acțiune furnizat de guvern indicând măsurile adoptate în vederea executării hotărârii (a se vedea documentul DH-DD(2013) [39] Se asigură că toate măsurile prevăzute la art. 46 alineatul (1) au fost adoptate, DECURSĂ că acesta și-a îndeplinit funcțiile în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (2) din Convenție în această cauză și DECIDE d.n.n.n. investigation. Acțiune report [1] Information about the Measures to comply with the judgments in the case Łaszkiewicz against Poland (în limba engleză) Case description Łaszkiewicz, Application No. 28481/03, judgment of 15/01/2008 final on 15/04/2008 Această rubrică se referă la o încălcare a articolului 5 alineatul (4) din Convenție as the procesedings before the Katowice District Court, in 2003, which reviewed lawfulness of the applicicants detention on remand failed to ensure equality of arms and was not truly adversarial since the applicant could not aquately challenge moțions for prelungition of her detention. Neither the applicant nor her lawyer were servind with copii of motions for revision of the applicicants detention and had the access to the case files. Individual measures the Court held that the finding of a încălcarea Constituted in itself sucient just satisfaction for any non pecuniary damage sustained by the applicant.Acording to the judgment on 27/01/2004, the Katowice Regional Prosecutor ordered the applicant The case is similar to the case Chruściński v. Poland, Application No. 28481/03, in which the Committee has clond its supervision, see: CM/ResDH(2011)142. The judgment of the Court in Łaszkiewicz case was translated into Polish and publicished on the website of the Ministry of Justice (www.ms.gov.pl). In these circumstances, no further general measure appears necessary. III. Concluzii ale respondentului State The government considers that no individual measures are necessary in the present case and that the general Measures adopted, notably the legislative changes, will be sucient to conclusion that Poland has commised with its obligations under Article 46, paragraph 1 of the convention in respect to the breach of Article 6, paragraph 1 of the convention. [1] Informații submitted by the Polish authorities on 20 March 2013.

Résolution CM/ResDH(2013)85

Łaszkiewicz contre Pologne

Exécution de l’arrêt de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme

(Requête n

o

28481/03, arrêt du 15/01/2008, définitif le 15/04/2008)

(adoptée par le Comité des Ministres le 7 mai 2013,

lors de la 1170e réunion des Délégués des Ministres)

Le Comité des Ministres, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales, qui prévoit que le Comité surveille l’exécution des arrêts définitifs de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (ci-après nommées «

la Convention

» et «

la Cour

»),

Vu l’arrêt définitif qui a été transmis par la Cour au Comité dans l’affaire ci-dessus et les violations constatées

;

Rappelant l’obligation de l’Etat défendeur, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe

1, de la Convention, de se conformer aux arrêts définitifs dans les litiges auxquels il est partie et que cette obligation implique, outre le paiement de la satisfaction équitable octroyée par la Cour, l’adoption par les autorités de l’Etat défendeur, si nécessaire

:

-

de mesures individuelles pour mettre fin aux violations constatées et en effacer les conséquences, dans la mesure du possible par

restitutio in integrum

;

et

-

de mesures générales permettant de prévenir des violations semblables ;

Ayant invité le gouvernement de l’Etat défendeur à informer le Comité des mesures prises pour se conformer à l’obligation susmentionnée

;

Ayant examiné le bilan d’action fourni par le gouvernement indiquant les mesures adoptées afin d’exécuter l’arrêt (voir document DH-DD(2013)318E)

;

S’étant assuré que toutes les mesures requises par l’article 46, paragraphe 1, ont été adoptées,

DECLARE qu’il a rempli ses fonctions en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention dans cette affaire et

DECIDE d’en clore l’examen.

Action report

[1]

Information about the measures to comply with the judgments in the case

Łaszkiewicz against Poland

(anglais seulement)

Case description

Łaszkiewicz, Application No. 28481/03, judgment of 15/01/2008, final on 15/04/2008

This case concerns a violation of Article 5 § 4 of the Convention as the proceedings before the Katowice District Court, in 2003, which reviewed lawfulness of the applicant’s detention on remand failed to ensure equality of arms and was not truly adversarial since the applicant could not adequately challenge motions for prolongation of her detention. Neither the applicant nor her lawyer were served with copies of motions for prolongation of the applicant’s detention and had the access to the case files.

I.

Individual measures

The Court held that the finding of a violation constituted in itself sufficient just satisfaction for any non

‑

pecuniary damage sustained by the applicant. According to the judgment on 27/01/2004, the Katowice Regional Prosecutor ordered the applicant’s release. On 7 June 2004 the applicant’s counsel was allowed to consult the file.

In these circumstances, no other individual measure appears necessary.

II.

General measures

The case is similar to the case Chruściński v. Poland, Application No. 28481/03, in which the Committee has closed its supervision, see: CM/ResDH(2011)142.

The judgment of the Court in Łaszkiewicz case was translated into Polish and published on the website of the Ministry of Justice (www.ms.gov.pl).

In these circumstances, no further general measure appears necessary.

III.

Conclusions of the respondent State

The government considers that no individual measures are necessary in the present case and that the general measures adopted, notably the legislative changes, will be sufficient to conclude that Poland has complied with its obligations under Article 46, paragraph 1 of the Convention in respect to the breach of Article 6, paragraph 1 of the Convention.

[1]

Information submitted by the Polish authorities on 20 March 2013.