ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 16.07.2015 Auto

CASE OF GAZSÓ v. HUNGARY

RESPONDENT
HUN
HOTĂRÂRE
16.07.2015
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Violation of Article 13+6-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2015
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză 
CASE OF GAZSÓ v. HUNGARY (CtEDO, 2015)
HUDOC · oficial

Reclamantul s-a născut în 1963 și locuiește în Telki. Între 25 februarie 2002 și 18 mai 2005, litigiile au fost în curs între reclamant și fostul său angajator. Acesta a fost în cele din urmă obligată să reelaboreze reclamantul. Reclamantul nu a acceptat poziția care i-a fost oferită în urmărirea ordinului de relocare a forței de muncă. Noua litigiu a început la 5 ianuarie 2006. La 18 noiembrie 2008, Curtea de Muncire din Budapesta a respins acțiunea reclamantului. Prin recurs, la 9 iulie 2010, Curtea Regională de Budapesta a anulat această decizie și a constatat pentru reclamant. 10. Acuzatul a urmărit o cerere de reexaminare înainte de Kúria. La 29 februarie 2012, această instanță a anulat hotărârea privind recursul și a constatat în favoarea acestuia.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2014-11-13
0,94
GAZSÓ v. HUNGARY
48322/12 György GAZSÓ against Hungary lodged on 24 July 2012 STATEMENT OF FACTS The applicant, Mr György Gazsó, is a Hungarian national, who was born in 1963 and lives in Telki. He is represented before the Court by Mr D. Karsai, a lawyer p
CtEDO 2017-11-21
0,93
CASE OF SCHESZTÁK v. HUNGARY
5. The applicant was born in 1953 and lives in Ercsi. 6. On 28 February 2007 the applicant filed an action with the Székesfehérvár Labour Court against his former employer, claiming unlawful dismissal. On 6 June 2008 the court found in his
CtEDO 2009-02-24
0,93
CASE OF EOSOLY v. HUNGARY
4. The applicant was born in 1958 and lives in Hévízgyörk. 5. The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 6. In 1996 the applicant brought an action in compensation against his former employer before th
CtEDO 2011-01-11
0,92
CASE OF BARATI v. HUNGARY
4. The applicant was born in 1975 and lives in Hatvan. 5. In February 1999 the applicant was dismissed from his job; his former employer also required him to make certain payments in respect of damage allegedly caused while in service. The
CtEDO 2015-05-26
0,91
CASE OF TÓTH v. HUNGARY
SECOND SECTION CASE OF TÓTH v. HUNGARY (Application no. 14099/12) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 26 May 2015 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Tóth v. Hungary, The European Court of Human Rights (Second
Sursă