ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 08.12.2015 Auto

CASE OF KULYUK AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

RESPONDENT
RUS
HOTĂRÂRE
08.12.2015
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Civil rights and obligations;Reasonable time);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2015
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
CASE OF KULYUK AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (CtEDO, 2015)
HUDOC · oficial

Reclamanții sunt pensionari. În diferite date, au dat în judecată cu succes autorităților pentru calcularea greșită și ajustarea pensiilor lor. Hotărârile au devenit finale. În diferite date, Presidia curților regionale sau Curtea Supremă a Federației Ruse a permis autorităților inculpate de reexaminare și a anulat hotărârile pronunțate în favoarea reclamanților, având în vedere că instanța inferioară a aplicat greșit legislația materială. Unele dintre hotărârile nu au fost aplicate sau parțial până la data încheierii sau au fost aplicate cu întârziere.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2015-12-08
0,93
CASE OF KOVALENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
5. The applicants, whose names and years of birth are tabulated in Appendix I, took part in the cleaning-up operation at the Chernobyl nuclear disaster site. They were subsequently registered disabled, becoming entitled to various social be
CtEDO 2010-09-23
0,92
CASE OF KONENKOVA and other "Privileged pensioners" v. RUSSIA
4. The applicants are pensioners who live in the Moscow Region. Before retirement, they used to work in hazardous industries. They had a dispute with a pension authority about the scope of their privileged pensions and appealed to the Regio
CtEDO 2015-12-08
0,92
CASE OF KLIMOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
4. The applicants are Russian citizens whose details are tabulated in the Appendix. 5. The applicants brought court actions against the authorities, seeking to recover the monetary value of the State promissory notes for purchasing of Russi
CtEDO 2012-09-18
0,92
ALOV v. RUSSIA AND OTHER APPLICATIONS
They successfully sued authorities for miscalculating their old age pensions or other social benefit payments. Subsequently, on the authorities’ initiative, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation or Regional Courts quashed the final ju
CtEDO 2005-10-13
0,91
CASE OF VASILYEV v. RUSSIA
empowered the relevant officials to stay the execution of the judgment, decision or ruling in question until the supervisory review proceedings had been completed. 23. Courts hearing applications for supervisory review had extensive jurisdi
Sursă